Catherine Stamoulis
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Charles A. NelsonNathan A. FoxCharles H. ZeanahTong ZhuJohanna BickBernard S. ChangMihail SamnalievS. Bryn Austin
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (19 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (18 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (14 papers)
- Journals
- BioinformaticsPLoS ONENeuroImage
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSpain
In The Last Decade
Catherine Stamoulis
69 papers receiving 852 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Cognitive Neuroscience 181
- Clinical Psychology 158
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 120
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 103
- Surgery 95
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Stamoulis
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Stamoulis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Stamoulis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Stamoulis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Stamoulis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Stamoulis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Stamoulis. The network helps show where Catherine Stamoulis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Stamoulis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Stamoulis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Stamoulis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Stamoulis. Catherine Stamoulis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Catherine Stamoulis
Catherine Stamoulis is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Reproductive Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 78 papers that have together received 878 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (19 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (18 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (181 citations), Clinical Psychology (158 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (26 citations). Catherine Stamoulis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Charles A. Nelson, Nathan A. Fox, Charles H. Zeanah, Tong Zhu, Johanna Bick, Bernard S. Chang, Mihail Samnaliev, S. Bryn Austin, Madina Agénor and Eliot S. Katz. Their work appears in journals such as Bioinformatics, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.