Catherine Reeve
Impact in
- Genetics top 10%
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions
Papers in
- Genetics 11
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies 11
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Elena Ratschen (3 shared papers)Daniel S. Mills (3 shared papers)Paul Toner (3 shared papers)Lion Shahab (3 shared papers)Dimitra Kale (3 shared papers)Emily Shoesmith (3 shared papers)Karine Silva (1 shared paper)Simon Gadbois (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (3 papers)Behavioural Processes (2 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2 papers)Animal Welfare (2 papers)Frontiers in Veterinary Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Catherine Reeve
17 papers receiving 392 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Genetics 265
- Geography, Planning and Development 50
- Small Animals 66
- Sensory Systems 42
- Virology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Reeve
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Reeve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Reeve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Reeve more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Reeve
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Reeve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Reeve. The network helps show where Catherine Reeve may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Reeve, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 146 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 19 | The New Photography: A Guide to New Images, Processes, and Display Techniques for Photographers | 1984 | 0 |
About Catherine Reeve
Catherine Reeve is a scholar working on Genetics, Sensory Systems, Biomedical Engineering, Small Animals and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (11 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (2 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (265 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (50 citations), Small Animals (66 citations), Sensory Systems (42 citations) and Virology (34 citations). Catherine Reeve has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Elena Ratschen, Daniel S. Mills, Paul Toner, Lion Shahab, Dimitra Kale, Emily Shoesmith, Karine Silva, Simon Gadbois, Grace Carroll and Zachary W. Petzel. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Behavioural Processes, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Animal Welfare and Frontiers in Veterinary Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.