Catherine Proenza
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Surgery
- Cell Biology
- Co-authors
- Eric A. AcciliKurt G. BeamEric D. LarsonEmily J. SharpeGary YellenMirko BaruscottiJoshua R. St. ClairDario DiFrancesco
- Topics
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (35 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (30 papers)Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Catherine Proenza
43 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 801
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 549
- Surgery 119
- Cell Biology 78
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Proenza
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Proenza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Proenza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Proenza more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Proenza
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Proenza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Proenza. The network helps show where Catherine Proenza may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Proenza
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Proenza. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Proenza based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Proenza. Catherine Proenza is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 83 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 55 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 97 | |
| 17 | 89 | |
| 18 | 75 | |
| 19 | 46 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Catherine Proenza
Catherine Proenza is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (35 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (30 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (801 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (549 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.2k citations). Catherine Proenza has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Eric A. Accili, Kurt G. Beam, Eric D. Larson, Emily J. Sharpe, Gary Yellen, Mirko Baruscotti, Joshua R. St. Clair, Dario DiFrancesco, Katarína Štroffeková and Zhandi Liao. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Circulation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.