Catherine M. Dean

7.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
127 papers, 5.2k citations indexed

About

Catherine M. Dean is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Catherine M. Dean has authored 127 papers receiving a total of 5.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 73 papers in Rehabilitation, 55 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 41 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Catherine M. Dean's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (70 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (50 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (41 papers). Catherine M. Dean is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (70 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (50 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (41 papers). Catherine M. Dean collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Catherine M. Dean's co-authors include Louise Ada, Francine Malouin, Carol L. Richards, Roberta B. Shepherd, Roger Adams, Julia M. Hush, Elisabeth Preston, Rosalyn Stanton, Catherine Sherrington and A. M. Gentile and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Catherine M. Dean

121 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: A randomized, controlled pilot trial

2000 502 citations Catherine M. Dean, Carol L. Richards et al. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation profile →

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Catherine M. Dean	3.2k	2.4k	1.8k	886	750	127	5.2k
Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira‐Salmela	2.6k 0.8×	1.9k 0.8×	1.5k 0.8×	801 0.9×	734 1.0×	231	5.3k
Marco Y.C. Pang	2.1k 0.7×	2.2k 0.9×	2.0k 1.1×	802 0.9×	615 0.8×	182	5.8k
Sarah Tyson	2.9k 0.9×	2.1k 0.9×	1.4k 0.8×	706 0.8×	726 1.0×	168	5.2k
Catherine Sackley	2.1k 0.7×	2.2k 0.9×	1.4k 0.8×	1.9k 2.1×	1.5k 1.9×	209	7.4k
Ingrid van de Port	2.2k 0.7×	1.4k 0.6×	907 0.5×	548 0.6×	876 1.2×	92	4.4k
Marilyn MacKay-Lyons	3.9k 1.2×	1.3k 0.5×	1.0k 0.6×	859 1.0×	1.8k 2.4×	62	5.3k
Sylvie Nadeau	2.4k 0.8×	2.3k 1.0×	1.9k 1.0×	540 0.6×	429 0.6×	202	5.8k
Louise Ada	4.6k 1.4×	3.3k 1.4×	1.7k 0.9×	2.3k 2.6×	1.0k 1.3×	190	7.0k
Ann Ashburn	3.0k 0.9×	2.9k 1.2×	2.6k 1.4×	1.9k 2.2×	1.1k 1.5×	104	5.9k
Eline Lindeman	3.9k 1.2×	3.0k 1.3×	946 0.5×	1.6k 1.8×	1.7k 2.3×	149	9.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine M. Dean

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine M. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine M. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine M. Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine M. Dean

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine M. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine M. Dean. The network helps show where Catherine M. Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine M. Dean

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine M. Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine M. Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine M. Dean. Catherine M. Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hassett, Leanne, et al.. (2024). Mechanically assisted walking with body weight support results in more independent walking and better walking ability compared with usual walking training in non-ambulatory adults early after stroke: a systematic review. Journal of physiotherapy. 71(1). 18–26. 1 indexed citations

Dean, Catherine M., et al.. (2023). A Transparent Curriculum Design and Capability-Based Assessment Portfolio Facilitates Self-Directed Learning. Education Sciences. 14(1). 29–29. 1 indexed citations

Scrivener, Katharine, Catherine M. Dean, Ian D. Cameron, & Louise Ada. (2022). Stroke in Australia: long term survivors have fallen into a black hole. The Medical Journal of Australia. 217(6). 290–291. 6 indexed citations

Preston, Elisabeth, Louise Ada, Rosalyn Stanton, Niruthikha Mahendran, & Catherine M. Dean. (2021). Prediction of Independent Walking in People Who Are Nonambulatory Early After Stroke. Stroke. 52(10). 3217–3224. 45 indexed citations

Koelmeyer, Louise, Leigh C. Ward, Catherine M. Dean, & John Boyages. (2020). Body Positional Effects on Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Measurements for Lymphedema Assessment of the Arm. Lymphatic Research and Biology. 18(5). 464–473. 22 indexed citations

Schooten, Kimberley S. van, Morag E. Taylor, Jacqueline Close, et al.. (2020). Sensorimotor, Cognitive, and Affective Functions Contribute to the Prediction of Falls in Old Age and Neurologic Disorders: An Observational Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 102(5). 874–880. 14 indexed citations

Noblet, Tim, John Marriott, Taryn Jones, Catherine M. Dean, & Alison Rushton. (2019). Perceptions of Australian physiotherapy students about the potential implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey. BMJ Open. 9(5). e026327–e026327. 6 indexed citations

Noblet, Tim, John Marriott, Taryn Jones, Catherine M. Dean, & Alison Rushton. (2019). Perceptions about the implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey of Australian physiotherapists. BMJ Open. 9(5). e024991–e024991. 10 indexed citations

Preston, Elisabeth, Catherine M. Dean, Louise Ada, et al.. (2017). Promoting physical activity after stroke via self-management: a feasibility study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 24(5). 353–360. 31 indexed citations

10.

Wollesen, Bettina, et al.. (2017). Dual-Task Walking Performance in Older Persons With Hearing Impairment: Implications for Interventions From a Preliminary Observational Study. Ear and Hearing. 39(2). 337–343. 24 indexed citations

11.

Walker, Marion, Tammy Hoffmann, Marian Brady, et al.. (2017). Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. International Journal of Stroke. 12(5). 472–479. 94 indexed citations

12.

Preston, Elisabeth, Louise Ada, Catherine M. Dean, Rosalyn Stanton, & Gordon Waddington. (2015). Evaluation of a self-administered video based PUSH (Promoting Use from Shoulder to Hand) program for people following stroke. International Journal of Stroke. 10. 76–76.

13.

Dean, Catherine M., et al.. (2015). How hard do people work in therapy involving technology versus traditional therapy in rehabilitation. International Journal of Stroke. 10. 54–54. 1 indexed citations

14.

Stanton, Rosalyn, Louise Ada, Catherine M. Dean, & Elisabeth Preston. (2015). The effect of information feedback on training standing up following stroke: A feasibility study. International Journal of Stroke. 10. 80–80. 1 indexed citations

15.

Jones, Taryn, Catherine M. Dean, Blake F. Dear, Julia M. Hush, & Nickolai Titov. (2015). Design and development of an internet-delivered self-management course to increase physical activity after acquired brain injury. International Journal of Stroke. 10. 36–36. 2 indexed citations

16.

Jones, Taryn, Catherine M. Dean, Blake F. Dear, Julia M. Hush, & Nickolai Titov. (2015). An internet survey of the characteristics and physical activity of community-dwelling Australian adults with acquired brain injury: Exploring interest in an internet-delivered self-management program focused on physical activity. Disability and health journal. 9(1). 54–63. 8 indexed citations

17.

Dean, Catherine M., Louise Ada, & Richard I. Lindley. (2014). Faster walkers benefit more from treadmill training after stroke: A secondary analysis of a randomised trial. International Journal of Stroke. 9. 7–7.

18.

Jones, Thomas M., Catherine M. Dean, Julia M. Hush, Blake F. Dear, & Nickolai Titov. (2014). Is the concept of an internet-based self-management program to increase physical activity acceptable to community-dwelling stroke survivors?. International Journal of Stroke. 9. 1 indexed citations

19.

Richards, Carol L., Francine Malouin, & Catherine M. Dean. (2000). Maximizing locomotor recovery after stroke. Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry. 108. 2 indexed citations

20.

Herbert, Rob, et al.. (1998). Effects of real and imagined training on voluntary muscle activation during maximal isometric contractions. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 163(4). 361–368. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact