Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Longley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Longley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Longley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Longley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Longley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Longley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Longley. The network helps show where Catherine Longley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Longley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Longley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Longley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Longley. Catherine Longley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rajaratnam, Surendran, et al.. (2016). Gender inequalities in access to and benefits derived from the natural fishery in the Barotse Floodplain, Zambia, Southern Africa. Asian Fisheries Science. 29. 49–71.12 indexed citations
Longley, Catherine, et al.. (2014). The Role of Fish in the First 1,000 Days in Zambia. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).16 indexed citations
Longley, Catherine, Ian Christoplos, & Tom Slaymaker. (2006). Agricultural rehabilitation. Mapping the linkagesbetween humanitarian relief, social protection and development..18 indexed citations
9.
Longley, Catherine, et al.. (2006). Seed vouchers in emergency programming: Lessons from Ethiopia and Mozambique..6 indexed citations
10.
Longley, Catherine, et al.. (2005). Agricultural Input Trade Fairs and Vouchers in Mozambique:Experiences and lessons learned.3 indexed citations
11.
Longley, Catherine, et al.. (2004). Relief or agricultural development? Emergency seed projects, farmer seed systems and the dissemination of modern varieties in Mali and Niger. Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics).
Brown, David, et al.. (2002). Participatory methodologies and participatory practices: assessing PRA use in The Gambia.. Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University).8 indexed citations
14.
Hussein, Karim, et al.. (2002). Participation in Practice: Case Studies from the Gambia.9 indexed citations
15.
Brown, David, et al.. (2002). The Gambian-German Forestry Project.. 147–189.1 indexed citations
Longley, Catherine, et al.. (2001). Supporting local seed systems in southern Somalia: a developmental approach to agricultural rehabilitation in emergency situations.. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).8 indexed citations
18.
Longley, Catherine, et al.. (1999). Farmers' management of genetic variability in rice.2 indexed citations
19.
Longley, Catherine. (1997). Effects of war and displacement on local seed systems in northern Sierra Leone. Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University).3 indexed citations
20.
Richards, Paul, et al.. (1997). Seeds and Survival: Crop Genetic Resources in War and Reconstruction in Africa. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).33 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.