Catherine L. Craig
- Genetics top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Biomaterials top 1%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Gary D. BernardMarie E. HerbersteinChristian RiekelMark A. ElgarJonathan A. CoddingtonDavid L. KaplanNaomi E. PierceC.-I. Brändén
- Topics
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (27 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (15 papers)Silk-based biomaterials and applications (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaFrance
In The Last Decade
Catherine L. Craig
40 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Genetics 1.5k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
- Biomaterials 1.0k
- Insect Science 467
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 415
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine L. Craig
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine L. Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine L. Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine L. Craig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine L. Craig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine L. Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine L. Craig. The network helps show where Catherine L. Craig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine L. Craig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine L. Craig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine L. Craig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine L. Craig. Catherine L. Craig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 50 | |
| 6 | 123 | |
| 7 | 54 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | Foraging strategies and feeding regimes: Web and decoration investment in Argiope keyserlingi Karsch (Araneae: Araneidae) | 119 |
| 10 | 85 | |
| 11 | 165 | |
| 12 | 146 | |
| 13 | 88 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 62 | |
| 19 | 126 | |
| 20 | 78 |
About Catherine L. Craig
Catherine L. Craig is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Research and Theory and Genetics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (27 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (15 papers) and Silk-based biomaterials and applications (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (1.0k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations) and Genetics (1.5k citations). Catherine L. Craig has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Gary D. Bernard, Marie E. Herberstein, Christian Riekel, Mark A. Elgar, Jonathan A. Coddington, David L. Kaplan, Naomi E. Pierce, C.-I. Brändén, Robert S. Weber and Martin Müller. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Ecology and The American Naturalist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.