Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Electrochemistry
- Sensory Systems
- Co-authors
- Richard W. AldrichTed BegenisichNévéna MollovaLeslie C. McKinneyDmitry O. KoltunThao PerryTetsuya KobayashiRuth Anne Eatock
- Topics
- Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (6 papers)Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers)
- Journals
- Biophysical JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology-Cell PhysiologyThe Journal of General Physiology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell
10 papers receiving 368 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Molecular Biology 343
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 221
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 199
- Electrochemistry 25
- Sensory Systems 15
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell. The network helps show where Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell. Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 143 | |
| 5 | 129 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 5 |
About Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell
Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Electrochemistry, having authored 10 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (6 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (221 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (199 citations) and Molecular Biology (343 citations). Catherine J. Smith‐Maxwell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard W. Aldrich, Ted Begenisich, Névéna Mollova, Leslie C. McKinney, Dmitry O. Koltun, Thao Perry, Tetsuya Kobayashi, Ruth Anne Eatock, Jeff Zablocki and Sridharan Rajamani. Their work appears in journals such as Biophysical Journal, American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology and The Journal of General Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.