Catherine Hurley

986 citations
22 papers · 581 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Catherine Hurley

21 papers receiving 534 citations

Peers

Catherine Hurley
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 200
  • Signal Processing 97
  • Statistics and Probability 61
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 25
  • Artificial Intelligence 205
Replace Joanne Wendelberger with:
Joanne Wendelberger United States
Leandro Tortosa Spain
Margareta Ackerman United States
Christophe Abraham France
Ming Dong United States
Otto Opitz Germany
Lawrence C. Rafsky United States
R. Wayne Oldford Canada
Catherine Hurley relative to Joanne Wendelberger United States Joanne Wendelberger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Joanne Wendelberger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Hurley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Hurley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Hurley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Hurley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Hurley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Hurley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Hurley. The network helps show where Catherine Hurley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Hurley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine Hurley Line = papers co-authored together Catherine Hurley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995130
2 1997103
3 202170
4 199562
5 200457
6 199040
7 201035
8 201419
9 201112
10 20179
11 20117
12 20236
13 19936
14 20235
15 20175
16 20214
17 20233
18 20203
19 20002
20 19932

About Catherine Hurley

Catherine Hurley is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Food Science, Statistics and Probability and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (12 papers), Data Analysis with R (9 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (3 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (2 papers), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (2 papers) and Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (200 citations), Signal Processing (97 citations), Statistics and Probability (61 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (25 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (205 citations). Catherine Hurley has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Buja, Dianne Cook, Javier Cabrera, R. Wayne Oldford, Andrew Parnell, Javier Cabrera, George Marshall, Graeme I. Stevenson, Alan C. Foster and Paul D. Leeson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Journal of Statistical Software, The Annals of Applied Statistics, The R Journal and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact