Cathal Doyle
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Health Policy Implementation Science 4
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 2
- Pharmacy top 2%
- Family Practice top 5%
-
- Information Systems Theories and Implementation 4
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 4
-
- Online and Blended Learning 3
-
- Knowledge Management and Sharing 3
-
- Health disparities and outcomes 2
-
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour 2
Cathal Doyle
26 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- General Health Professions 1.5k
- Pharmacy 129
- Health Information Management 119
- Family Practice 50
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 207
Countries citing papers authored by Cathal Doyle
This map shows the geographic impact of Cathal Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathal Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathal Doyle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cathal Doyle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathal Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathal Doyle. The network helps show where Cathal Doyle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cathal Doyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 106 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 13 | Meeting in the middle: bridging the practice research divide from both sides | 2016 | 0 |
| 14 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 15 | Supporting Cross Border Emergency Management Decision-Making | 2013 | 4 |
| 16 | A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectivenessbreakdown → | 2013 | 1610 |
| 17 | 2013 | 104 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 51 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 79 |
About Cathal Doyle
Cathal Doyle is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Information Systems and Management, Communication, Ecological Modeling and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 32 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.5k citations), Pharmacy (129 citations), Health Information Management (119 citations), Family Practice (50 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (207 citations). Cathal Doyle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Derek Bell, Laura Lennox, Cathy Howe, Julie Reed, Preeti Patel, James Barlow, Elena Pizzo, Rachel Matthews, Thomas Woodcock and Rowan Myron. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Decision System, BMJ Open, European Journal of Emergency Medicine, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and BMC Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.