Cathal Cadogan

3.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
70 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Cathal Cadogan is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Economics and Econometrics and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Cathal Cadogan has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 23 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 18 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Cathal Cadogan's work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (45 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (23 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (10 papers). Cathal Cadogan is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (45 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (23 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (10 papers). Cathal Cadogan collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Cathal Cadogan's co-authors include Carmel Hughes, Cristín Ryan, Ngaire Kerse, Susan Patterson, Marie C. Bradley, Chris R. Cardwell, Audrey Rankin, J Cooper, Jill Francis and Peter Passmore and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

In The Last Decade

Cathal Cadogan

63 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharm... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 2018 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cathal Cadogan Ireland 19 1.7k 947 597 445 333 70 2.5k
Caitríona Cahir Ireland 28 1.5k 0.9× 922 1.0× 834 1.4× 366 0.8× 330 1.0× 91 2.5k
Amy Page Australia 19 2.0k 1.1× 1.1k 1.2× 526 0.9× 423 1.0× 411 1.2× 101 2.7k
Daniela Fialová Czechia 23 1.6k 0.9× 771 0.8× 483 0.8× 404 0.9× 337 1.0× 66 2.4k
Marie C. Bradley United States 24 1.7k 1.0× 967 1.0× 567 0.9× 331 0.7× 382 1.1× 47 2.5k
Anne Spinewine Belgium 27 2.4k 1.4× 1.2k 1.2× 717 1.2× 486 1.1× 497 1.5× 120 3.3k
Rohan A. Elliott Australia 26 1.8k 1.0× 653 0.7× 644 1.1× 608 1.4× 275 0.8× 108 2.4k
Emily Hajjar United States 16 2.4k 1.4× 1.2k 1.3× 751 1.3× 324 0.7× 682 2.0× 29 3.5k
Kurt E. Hersberger Switzerland 27 1.7k 1.0× 539 0.6× 967 1.6× 386 0.9× 353 1.1× 138 2.9k
J. Ross Maclean United States 15 1.4k 0.8× 816 0.9× 395 0.7× 360 0.8× 387 1.2× 29 2.7k
Christine M. Ruby United States 20 1.6k 0.9× 719 0.8× 398 0.7× 296 0.7× 329 1.0× 34 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Cathal Cadogan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cathal Cadogan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathal Cadogan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathal Cadogan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cathal Cadogan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathal Cadogan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathal Cadogan. The network helps show where Cathal Cadogan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cathal Cadogan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cathal Cadogan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cathal Cadogan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cathal Cadogan. Cathal Cadogan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
O’Brien, Denis, et al.. (2025). A systematic review of manipulations to pharmaceutical dosage forms used in psychotropic tapering plans. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 91(7). 1899–1913. 1 indexed citations
5.
Higgins, Agnès, Pat Bracken, Toto Gronlund, et al.. (2024). Identifying priorities for future research on reducing and stopping psychiatric medication: results of a James Lind Alliance priority-setting partnership. BMJ Open. 14(11). e088266–e088266. 4 indexed citations
7.
Paudyal, Vibhu, Betül Okuyan, Martin Henman, et al.. (2023). Scope, content and quality of clinical pharmacy practice guidelines: a systematic review. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 46(1). 56–69. 11 indexed citations
8.
Weidmann, Anita Elaine, Cathal Cadogan, Daniela Fialová, et al.. (2023). How to write a successful grant application: guidance provided by the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 45(3). 781–786. 3 indexed citations
9.
Patterson, Susan, Cathal Cadogan, Heather E. Barry, Kathleen Bennett, & Carmel Hughes. (2022). Cross-sectional questionnaire study of the experiences of community pharmacists in Northern Ireland during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: preparation, experience and response. BMJ Open. 12(9). e064545–e064545. 5 indexed citations
10.
Cadogan, Cathal, et al.. (2022). A scoping review of the methods and processes used by regulatory bodies to determine pharmacists’ readiness for practice. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 18(12). 4028–4037. 5 indexed citations
11.
Doyle, Frank, Jennifer Ryan, Barbara Clyne, et al.. (2021). Primary care-based models of care for osteoarthritis: a scoping review protocol. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 48–48. 4 indexed citations
13.
Cadogan, Cathal, et al.. (2021). Prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic scoping review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 100050–100050. 16 indexed citations
14.
Murphy, Melanie A., et al.. (2021). A systematic scoping review of interventions to optimise medication prescribing and adherence in older adults with cancer. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 18(3). 2392–2402. 7 indexed citations
15.
Rankin, Audrey, Heather E. Barry, Cathal Cadogan, et al.. (2020). A qualitative study to refine a theory-based intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast). 2 indexed citations
16.
Rankin, Audrey, Cathal Cadogan, Cristín Ryan, et al.. (2018). Development of a core outcome set for use in interventions aimed at improving appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 26. 6–7. 4 indexed citations
17.
Hughes, Carmel, et al.. (2016). Theory-Based Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence in Older Adults Prescribed Polypharmacy: A Systematic Review. Drugs & Aging. 34(2). 97–113. 81 indexed citations
18.
Cooper, J, Cathal Cadogan, Susan Patterson, et al.. (2015). Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy in older people: a Cochrane systematic review. BMJ Open. 5(12). e009235–e009235. 235 indexed citations
19.
Cadogan, Cathal, Cristín Ryan, & Carmel Hughes. (2015). Appropriate Polypharmacy and Medicine Safety: When Many is not Too Many. Drug Safety. 39(2). 109–116. 192 indexed citations
20.
Cadogan, Cathal, Cristín Ryan, Jill Francis, et al.. (2015). Improving appropriate polypharmacy for older people in primary care: selecting components of an evidence-based intervention to target prescribing and dispensing. Implementation Science. 10(1). 161–161. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026