Carsten Fuhs
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Software top 10%
- Information Systems
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Co-authors
- Jürgen GieslFabian EmmesMarc BrockschmidtPeter Schneider–KampThomas StröderJ G. BrotherstonJuan Antonio Pérez-OrtizStephan Falke
- Topics
- Logic, programming, and type systems (15 papers)Formal Methods in Verification (14 papers)Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers)
- Journals
- ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and SystemsJournal of Automated ReasoningInternational Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomDenmark
In The Last Decade
Carsten Fuhs
14 papers receiving 118 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
- Artificial Intelligence 100
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 90
- Software 45
- Information Systems 20
- Computer Networks and Communications 14
Countries citing papers authored by Carsten Fuhs
This map shows the geographic impact of Carsten Fuhs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carsten Fuhs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carsten Fuhs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carsten Fuhs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carsten Fuhs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carsten Fuhs. The network helps show where Carsten Fuhs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carsten Fuhs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carsten Fuhs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carsten Fuhs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carsten Fuhs. Carsten Fuhs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 14th International Workshop on Termination (WST 2014) | 0 |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | Automated Termination Analysis for Programs with Pointer Arithmetic | 0 |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | Synthesizing Shortest Straight-Line Programs over GF(2) using SAT | 0 |
| 17 | SAT Instances for Termination Analysis with AProVE | 0 |
| 18 | 1 |
About Carsten Fuhs
Carsten Fuhs is a scholar working on Software, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 18 papers that have together received 123 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (15 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (14 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (45 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (90 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (100 citations). Carsten Fuhs has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Giesl, Fabian Emmes, Marc Brockschmidt, Peter Schneider–Kamp, Thomas Ströder, J G. Brotherston, Juan Antonio Pérez-Ortiz, Stephan Falke, Nikos Gorogiannis and Florian Frohn. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, Journal of Automated Reasoning and International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.