Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Carroll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carroll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carroll more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carroll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carroll. The network helps show where Carroll may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carroll
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carroll.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carroll based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Carroll. Carroll is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Andrew, et al.. (2014). T-DNA-Induced Chromosomal Translocations in feronia and anxur2 Mutants Reveal Implications for the Mechanism of Collapsed Pollen Due to Chromosomal Rearrangements. 分子植物：英文版. 1591–1594.1 indexed citations
2.
Bishop, N. C., Ralph W. Young, Gregory A. Ten Eyck, et al.. (2011). Triangulating the source of tunneling resonances in a point contact with nanometer scale sensitivity. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2011.1 indexed citations
3.
Thompson, Nicola, et al.. (2009). Developing the English Uplands: A report to the Commission for Rural Communities' Inquiry into the Future for England's Upland Communities.1 indexed citations
4.
Carroll, et al.. (2007). Evaluating an educational approach to improve pain assessment in hospitalized patients.. Journal of Nursing Care Quality.12 indexed citations
5.
Carroll, et al.. (2007). Adult duodenal intussusception associated with congenital malrotation. 世界胃肠病学杂志：英文版（电子版）. 13(28). 3892–3894.1 indexed citations
6.
Pan, W., et al.. (2005). Photoluminescence from silicon nanocrystals embedded in Silicon oxides. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.
7.
Carroll. (2005). Implications of fatigue on patient and nurse safety.. PubMed. 105(3). 7–7.3 indexed citations
8.
MURPHY, MURPHY, et al.. (1997). Rheology of the Montserrat lavas. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 194–194.1 indexed citations
9.
Carroll, et al.. (1994). Sulfur, noble gases, and halogens: solubility relations of the less abundant volatile species in magmas. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).4 indexed citations
10.
Carroll, et al.. (1994). Noble Gas Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry.75 indexed citations
11.
Blank, Jennifer G., et al.. (1993). Solubilities of carbon dioxide and water in rhyolitic melts. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 119.3 indexed citations
12.
Carroll. (1993). Assessing and addressing violence in the acute care setting.. PubMed. 68(9). 3–4.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.