Caroline Payne

1.5k citations
14 papers · 734 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Caroline Payne

13 papers receiving 722 citations

Peers

Caroline Payne
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Sensory Systems 246
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 171
  • Developmental Biology 20
  • Social Psychology 166
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 154
Replace Claude Baudoin with:
Claude Baudoin France
Sandeepa Dey United States
Celeste R. Wirsig‐Wiechmann United States
J Bard United States
Isabel Legáz Spain
Shouichiro Saito Japan
Sachiko Haga‐Yamanaka United States
Ming‐Shan Chien United States
Yong Lu United States
Annie M. Burrows United States
Caroline Payne relative to Claude Baudoin France Claude Baudoin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Claude Baudoin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Payne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Payne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Payne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Payne. The network helps show where Caroline Payne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Payne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Payne Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Payne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2001456
2 199762
3 200257
4 201337
5
Application of the Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device (PICO) on a Heterogeneous Group of Surgical and Traumatic Wounds.
201428
6 200628
7 200716
8 201015
9 200011
10 200310
11 20029
12 20084
13
LSCI in a School Setting: Final Results.
20091
14 20250

About Caroline Payne

Caroline Payne is a scholar working on Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 734 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (4 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Genital Health and Disease (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper), Surgical site infection prevention (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper) and Urological Disorders and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (246 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (171 citations), Developmental Biology (20 citations), Social Psychology (166 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (154 citations). Caroline Payne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jane L. Hurst, Duncan H. L. Robertson, Robert J. Beynon, Richard E. Humphries, Andrea Cavaggioni, Charlotte M. Nevison, Joseph E. Van Sickels, Stephen Southern, Stefan O.P. Hofer and Simon J. Gaskell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Nature, Journal of Chemical Ecology and Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact