Caroline Doyle

414 citations
33 papers · 251 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Caroline Doyle

31 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

Caroline Doyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Applied Psychology 17
  • Sociology and Political Science 101
  • General Health Professions 48
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 25
  • Clinical Psychology 36
Replace Andreas Klocke with:
Andreas Klocke Germany
Thomasine Heitkamp United States
Irene Glasser United States
David Canter United Kingdom
Mark Alden Morgan United States
Katie Aubrecht Canada
Azra Daei Iran
Henry Yeomans United Kingdom
Kim Samuel United Kingdom
Heribert Engstler Germany
Caroline Doyle relative to Andreas Klocke Germany Andreas Klocke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Andreas Klocke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Doyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Doyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Doyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Doyle. The network helps show where Caroline Doyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Doyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Doyle Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Doyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201630
2 201929
3 201528
4 202117
5 201814
6 201614
7 202013
8 201612
9 202012
10 20179
11 20188
12 20207
13 20216
14 20206
15 20206
16 20225
17 20225
18 20244
19 20213
20 20223

About Caroline Doyle

Caroline Doyle is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Education, having authored 33 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (9 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (8 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (7 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (4 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (4 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (17 citations), Sociology and Political Science (101 citations), General Health Professions (48 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (25 citations) and Clinical Psychology (36 citations). Caroline Doyle has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Tricia M. Leahey, Rena R. Wing, Karen Wells, Karen Gardner, Jessica Bihuniak, Xiaomeng Xu, Sophie Yates, Lorana Bartels, Melissa Flores and Daniel J. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy, International journal of law, crime and justice, Health Psychology, Australian Journal of Public Administration and Journal of Psychotherapy Integration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact