Caroline Bensa

789 total citations
8 papers, 230 citations indexed

About

Caroline Bensa is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline Bensa has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 230 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Caroline Bensa's work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). Caroline Bensa is often cited by papers focused on Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). Caroline Bensa collaborates with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Germany. Caroline Bensa's co-authors include J. de Sèze, Pierre Labauge, E Roullet, David Brassat, Pierre Clavelou, Marc Debouverie, Bruno Brochet, Christine Lebrun‐Frénay, Romain Deschamps and David Laplaud and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Multiple Sclerosis Journal and Revue Neurologique.

In The Last Decade

Caroline Bensa

7 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Caroline Bensa France 4 182 126 59 44 34 8 230
Nada Abou-Fayssal United States 5 122 0.7× 119 0.9× 89 1.5× 55 1.3× 23 0.7× 7 247
Gustavo Luna United States 3 272 1.5× 149 1.2× 112 1.9× 88 2.0× 43 1.3× 4 363
Guido Ahle France 5 281 1.5× 241 1.9× 254 4.3× 83 1.9× 21 0.6× 7 430
Stella Hughes United Kingdom 6 88 0.5× 42 0.3× 29 0.5× 13 0.3× 12 0.4× 11 134
Mathilde Goudot France 4 262 1.4× 225 1.8× 254 4.3× 85 1.9× 12 0.4× 5 388
Josef Gutman United States 3 106 0.6× 90 0.7× 85 1.4× 25 0.6× 11 0.3× 9 149
Jeanette Wendt United States 4 248 1.4× 126 1.0× 139 2.4× 78 1.8× 36 1.1× 5 326
Maurice Dahdaleh Saudi Arabia 11 230 1.3× 70 0.6× 28 0.5× 55 1.3× 54 1.6× 16 285
Ai‐Lan Nguyen Australia 9 107 0.6× 36 0.3× 15 0.3× 27 0.6× 21 0.6× 17 158
James Simsarian United States 9 185 1.0× 59 0.5× 12 0.2× 62 1.4× 87 2.6× 13 316

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Bensa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Bensa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Bensa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Bensa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Bensa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Bensa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Bensa. The network helps show where Caroline Bensa may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Bensa

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Bensa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Bensa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Bensa. Caroline Bensa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Louapre, Céline, Nicolas Collongues, Bruno Stankoff, et al.. (2020). Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 26. 49–50. 84 indexed citations
2.
Deschamps, Romain, C. Lamirel, Jérôme Lambert, et al.. (2020). Visual field loss and structure–function relationships in optic neuritis associated with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 27(6). 855–863. 13 indexed citations
3.
Zéphir, Hélène, Jean‐Christophe Ouallet, Emmanuelle Le Page, et al.. (2017). Is the Choosing Wisely® campaign model applicable to the management of multiple sclerosis in France? A GRESEP pilot study. Revue Neurologique. 174(1-2). 28–35. 1 indexed citations
4.
Lairy, G.C., Hélène Zéphir, Jean‐Christophe Ouallet, et al.. (2015). Targeted clinical audits immediately following the establishment of clinical practice guidelines for multiple sclerosis in 17 neurology departments: A pragmatic and collaborative study. Revue Neurologique. 171(5). 407–414. 3 indexed citations
5.
Guéguen, Antoine, P. Le Roux, Romain Deschamps, et al.. (2014). Abnormal inflammatory activity returns after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 85(9). 1038–1040. 27 indexed citations
6.
Debs, Rabab, et al.. (2010). Hypersignaux de la substance blanche révélant un pseudoxanthome élastique. Revue Neurologique. 166(10). 844–848. 2 indexed citations
7.
Lebrun‐Frénay, Christine, Caroline Bensa, Marc Debouverie, et al.. (2008). Unexpected multiple sclerosis: follow-up of 30 patients with magnetic resonance imaging and clinical conversion profile. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 79(2). 195–198. 100 indexed citations
8.
Bensa, Caroline, et al.. (2005). Méningite récurrente aseptique associée à une cirrhose biliaire primitive. Revue Neurologique. 161(1). 87–91.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026