Carole Smith

773 citations
33 papers · 471 indexed · h-index 11

Carole Smith

28 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Carole Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Public Administration 59
  • Safety Research 131
  • Health Information Management 35
  • General Health Professions 150
  • Clinical Psychology 113
Replace Rosemary Gillespie with:
Rosemary Gillespie United Kingdom
Ian Gibbs United Kingdom
Paula Dressel United States
Anne Opie New Zealand
Mavis Maclean United Kingdom
Lisa Dodson United States
Katherine van Wormer United States
Tina Taylor‐Ritzler United States
Noel Timms United Kingdom
Suellen Murray Australia
Carole Smith relative to Rosemary Gillespie United Kingdom Rosemary Gillespie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Rosemary Gillespie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carole Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carole Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carole Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carole Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carole Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carole Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carole Smith. The network helps show where Carole Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Carole Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carole Smith Line = papers co-authored together Carole Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20101
2
Shaken Baby Syndrome
20090
3 20076
4 200557
5 20056
6 200468
7
After Adoption: Direct Contact and Relationships
200316
8
Adoptive Parenthood as a 'Legal Fiction' - Its Consequences for Direct Post-Adoption Contact
20028
9
Re W and B; Re W (Care Plan) and Re S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan); Re W (Minors) (Care Order: Adequacy of Care Plan) Human Rights and the Children Act 1989
20021
10 20020
11 200021
12 19994
13 19972
14 199724
15 19971
16 199048
17 19829
18 19782
19 196733
20 196627

About Carole Smith

Carole Smith is a scholar working on Public Administration, Safety Research and Law, having authored 33 papers that have together received 471 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (9 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (7 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (4 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (59 citations), Safety Research (131 citations) and Health Information Management (35 citations). Carole Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Harrison, Stephen Harrison, Robert L. Hamblin, Richard H. Willis, Michael S. Wald, P. Herbert Leiderman, Elaine Walton, Heather Dale, Corinne Wattam and Nigel Parton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Journal of Social Work, Children & Society, Journal of Law and Society and Competition & Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026