Carol Chen‐Scarabelli

54 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Carol Chen‐Scarabelli
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 463
  • Molecular Biology 301
  • Surgery 267
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 138
  • Physiology 121
Replace Tetsuo Nakata with:
Tetsuo Nakata Japan
Hans‐Reinhard Zerkowski Germany
Riccardo Raddino Italy
Gema Ruiz‐Hurtado Spain
Outi Saijonmaa Finland
Henry Diep Australia
Eliana Hiromi Akamine Brazil
Aldo Pende Italy
Maike Knorr Germany
Kirsten Leineweber Germany
Carol Chen‐Scarabelli relative to Tetsuo Nakata Japan Tetsuo Nakata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tetsuo Nakata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carol Chen‐Scarabelli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carol Chen‐Scarabelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carol Chen‐Scarabelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carol Chen‐Scarabelli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carol Chen‐Scarabelli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carol Chen‐Scarabelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carol Chen‐Scarabelli. The network helps show where Carol Chen‐Scarabelli may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carol Chen‐Scarabelli

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carol Chen‐Scarabelli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carol Chen‐Scarabelli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carol Chen‐Scarabelli. Carol Chen‐Scarabelli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 6
2 19
3 7
4 4
5 41
6 3
7 30
8 0
9
Abstract 16403: Occurrence of Autophagy and Bridging of the Autophagic Process to Apoptotic and Necrotic Cell Death in the Human Heart With End-Stage Heart Failure
1
10 1
11 26
12 10
13 7
14 1
15
Use of octreotide, a long-acting somatostatin analogue, in the treatment of chylothorax of idiopathic etiology.
2
16 65
17 9
18 26
19 114
20 1

About Carol Chen‐Scarabelli

Carol Chen‐Scarabelli is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Toxicology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (9 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (8 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (463 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (72 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (138 citations). Carol Chen‐Scarabelli has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tiziano M. Scarabelli, Louis Saravolatz, Evasio Pasini, Anastasis Stephanou, Mohammed Murad, Richard A. Knight, Giovanni Corsetti, Francesco S. Dioguardi, Jagat Narula and Cláudia Romano. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and The Lancet Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026