Carmen Coteț

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 737 citations indexed

About

Carmen Coteț is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Carmen Coteț has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 737 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Carmen Coteț's work include Psychological Treatments and Assessments (3 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers). Carmen Coteț is often cited by papers focused on Psychological Treatments and Assessments (3 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers). Carmen Coteț collaborates with scholars based in Romania, United States and Netherlands. Carmen Coteț's co-authors include Ioana A. Cristea, Pim Cuijpers, Claudio Gentili, Corrado Barbui, Daniela Palomba, Daniel David, Ştefan Szamosközi, Liviu A. Fodor, Silviu Matu and Cristina Mogoaşe and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Personality and Individual Differences and JAMA Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Carmen Coteț

7 papers receiving 703 citations

Hit Papers

Efficacy of Psychotherapies for Borderline Personality Di... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Carmen Coteț Romania 7 533 132 130 108 97 7 737
Pamela Jacobsen United Kingdom 12 240 0.5× 235 1.8× 100 0.8× 157 1.5× 157 1.6× 51 635
Nynke Boonstra Netherlands 15 396 0.7× 565 4.3× 255 2.0× 136 1.3× 197 2.0× 73 940
Ralph Grabhorn Germany 14 502 0.9× 142 1.1× 44 0.3× 180 1.7× 94 1.0× 33 648
Joan Ribas‐Sabaté Spain 11 257 0.5× 155 1.2× 52 0.4× 68 0.6× 78 0.8× 18 504
Alexis Bourla France 12 160 0.3× 72 0.5× 28 0.2× 155 1.4× 50 0.5× 28 575
Frank Röhricht United Kingdom 22 402 0.8× 564 4.3× 365 2.8× 210 1.9× 271 2.8× 51 1.1k
Natasha Vorontsova United Kingdom 7 195 0.4× 320 2.4× 80 0.6× 233 2.2× 54 0.6× 11 523
Keith Bredemeier United States 11 285 0.5× 136 1.0× 52 0.4× 350 3.2× 152 1.6× 17 645
Elisabeth C. D. van der Stouwe Netherlands 8 144 0.3× 148 1.1× 34 0.3× 72 0.7× 52 0.5× 20 336
Helga Ising Netherlands 16 415 0.8× 817 6.2× 378 2.9× 262 2.4× 168 1.7× 31 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Carmen Coteț

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carmen Coteț's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carmen Coteț with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carmen Coteț more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carmen Coteț

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carmen Coteț. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carmen Coteț. The network helps show where Carmen Coteț may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carmen Coteț

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carmen Coteț. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carmen Coteț based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carmen Coteț. Carmen Coteț is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Fodor, Liviu A., Carmen Coteț, Pim Cuijpers, et al.. (2018). The effectiveness of virtual reality based interventions for symptoms of anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 10323–10323. 182 indexed citations
2.
David, Daniel, Carmen Coteț, Silviu Matu, Cristina Mogoaşe, & Simona Ștefan. (2017). 50 years of rational‐emotive and cognitive‐behavioral therapy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 74(3). 304–318. 91 indexed citations
3.
Cristea, Ioana A., Claudio Gentili, Carmen Coteț, et al.. (2017). Efficacy of Psychotherapies for Borderline Personality Disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 74(4). 319–319. 415 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Coteț, Carmen & Daniel David. (2016). The truth about predictions and emotions: Two meta-analyses of their relationship. Personality and Individual Differences. 94. 82–91. 9 indexed citations
5.
Nardelli, M., Gaetano Valenza, Ioana A. Cristea, et al.. (2015). Characterizing psychological dimensions in non-pathological subjects through autonomic nervous system dynamics. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 9. 37–37. 17 indexed citations
6.
David, Daniel, et al.. (2014). Cognitive-Behavioral Processes Based on Using the ABC Analysis by Trainees’ for Their Personal Development. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 32(3). 198–215. 11 indexed citations
7.
David, Daniel, Carmen Coteț, Aurora Szentágotai, James M. McMahon, & Raymond DiGiuseppe. (2013). Philosophical versus psychological unconditional acceptance: Implications for constructing the Unconditional Acceptance Questionnaire.. 13. 445. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026