Helga Ising
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mark van der GaagDorien H. NiemanJudith RietdijkRianne KlaassenSara DragtDon LinszenLex WunderinkWim Veling
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (23 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (16 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Helga Ising
31 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Psychiatry and Mental health 817
- Clinical Psychology 415
- Philosophy 378
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 262
- Social Psychology 168
Countries citing papers authored by Helga Ising
This map shows the geographic impact of Helga Ising's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helga Ising with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helga Ising more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helga Ising
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helga Ising. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helga Ising. The network helps show where Helga Ising may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helga Ising
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helga Ising. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helga Ising based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helga Ising. Helga Ising is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 54 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 88 | |
| 12 | Cost-effectiveness of CBT to prevent first-episode psychosis in ultra-high risk and further options for profiling | 1 |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | The results of a specific CBT intervention in young help-seeking patients with social decline and an ultra-high risk for developing a first-episode of psychosis | 1 |
| 17 | The Validity of the 16-Item Version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) to Screen for Ultra High Risk of Developing Psychosis in the General Help-Seeking Populationbreakdown → | 331 |
| 18 | 69 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About Helga Ising
Helga Ising is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (23 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (16 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (817 citations), Philosophy (378 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (56 citations). Helga Ising has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark van der Gaag, Dorien H. Nieman, Judith Rietdijk, Rianne Klaassen, Sara Dragt, Don Linszen, Lex Wunderink, Wim Veling, Pim Cuijpers and Rachel Loewy. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Schizophrenia Bulletin and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.