Carleton Brown

718 total citations
3 papers, 4 citations indexed

About

Carleton Brown is a scholar working on Classics, Language and Linguistics and Religious studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Carleton Brown has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 4 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Classics, 1 paper in Language and Linguistics and 1 paper in Religious studies. Recurrent topics in Carleton Brown's work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper) and Medieval Literature and History (1 paper). Carleton Brown is often cited by papers focused on Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper) and Medieval Literature and History (1 paper). Carleton Brown collaborates with scholars based in . Carleton Brown's co-authors include Edward Stankiewicz and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Entomology and Zoology and Books Abroad.

In The Last Decade

Carleton Brown

1 paper receiving 1 citation

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Carleton Brown	2	2	1	1	1	1	3	4
A. Petkov	2						2	2
James H. Walton	2						2	2
R Bravo Infante Spain	2						2	2
Hans Meyer Germany	2						7	5
Arthur H. Howell Philippines	2						2	3
Mohamad Faris United Kingdom	2						2	3
Wolfgang Müller United States	2					1 1.0×	5	5
P. Lawson United States	2						3	3
R. Atkins United States	2		1 1.0×				4	3
M. Kirkpatrick	2		1 1.0×				2	2

Countries citing papers authored by Carleton Brown

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carleton Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carleton Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carleton Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carleton Brown

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carleton Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carleton Brown. The network helps show where Carleton Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carleton Brown

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carleton Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carleton Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carleton Brown. Carleton Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

3 of 3 papers shown

1.

Brown, Carleton. (2009). A Register of Middle English Religious & Didactic Verse:. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

2.

Brown, Carleton. (2007). The Author of the Pearl: Considered in the Light of His Theological Opinions. 2 indexed citations

3.

Brown, Carleton, et al.. (1968). Introduction to Metrics: The Theory of Verse. Books Abroad. 42(1). 134–134. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact