Candice Thomas

2.1k total citations · 2 hit papers
59 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Candice Thomas is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Candice Thomas has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 24 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 24 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Candice Thomas's work include Topological Materials and Phenomena (28 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (25 papers) and Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (20 papers). Candice Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Topological Materials and Phenomena (28 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (25 papers) and Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (20 papers). Candice Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Denmark. Candice Thomas's co-authors include Michael J. Manfra, C. M. Marcus, Geoffrey C. Gardner, Alexander Whiticar, A. C. C. Drachmann, Antonio Fornieri, Fabrizio Nichele, Tian Wang, D. Kahng and A. T. Hatke and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Candice Thomas

55 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Scaling of Majorana Zero-Bias Conductance Peaks 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 2019 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Candice Thomas United States 17 1.2k 641 516 234 66 59 1.4k
S. M. Albrecht Denmark 6 1.4k 1.1× 728 1.1× 575 1.1× 95 0.4× 36 0.5× 7 1.4k
M. Ferrier France 18 791 0.6× 368 0.6× 514 1.0× 173 0.7× 48 0.7× 45 983
W. Kang United States 14 989 0.8× 616 1.0× 296 0.6× 254 1.1× 186 2.8× 29 1.2k
Yuval Ronen Israel 14 2.2k 1.8× 1.2k 1.8× 854 1.7× 205 0.9× 95 1.4× 20 2.3k
Tobias Holder Israel 19 678 0.6× 319 0.5× 395 0.8× 137 0.6× 184 2.8× 37 1.0k
Luca Galletti United States 17 606 0.5× 302 0.5× 547 1.1× 105 0.4× 196 3.0× 32 823
Lior Embon United States 7 425 0.3× 274 0.4× 427 0.8× 178 0.8× 116 1.8× 7 770
A. L. Rakhmanov Russia 19 857 0.7× 386 0.6× 674 1.3× 152 0.6× 201 3.0× 55 1.2k
Elia Strambini Italy 20 763 0.6× 598 0.9× 193 0.4× 210 0.9× 131 2.0× 42 967
Dorri Halbertal United States 13 494 0.4× 257 0.4× 387 0.8× 129 0.6× 88 1.3× 18 761

Countries citing papers authored by Candice Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Candice Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Candice Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Candice Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Candice Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Candice Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Candice Thomas. The network helps show where Candice Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Candice Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Candice Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Candice Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Candice Thomas. Candice Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Haaf, Sebastiaan L. D. ten, Yining Zhang, Alberto Bordin, et al.. (2025). Observation of edge and bulk states in a three-site Kitaev chain. Nature. 641(8064). 890–895. 9 indexed citations
2.
Haaf, Sebastiaan L. D. ten, Yining Zhang, Di Xiao, et al.. (2025). Flux-Controlled Two-Site Kitaev Chain. Physical Review Letters. 135(5). 56301–56301.
3.
Thomas, Candice, et al.. (2025). Fine pitch superconducting interconnects obtained with Nb–Nb direct bonding. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). 16001–16001.
4.
Xiao, Di, et al.. (2024). Flux-tunable hybridization in a double quantum dot interferometer. SciPost Physics. 17(3).
5.
Haaf, Sebastiaan L. D. ten, Chun-Xiao Liu, Philip Kim, et al.. (2024). A two-site Kitaev chain in a two-dimensional electron gas. Nature. 630(8016). 329–334. 37 indexed citations
6.
Xiao, Di, et al.. (2024). Flux-tunable Josephson effect in a four-terminal junction. Physical review. B.. 110(6). 2 indexed citations
7.
Thomas, Candice, et al.. (2023). Electronic g factor and tunable spin-orbit coupling in a gate-defined InSbAs quantum dot. Physical review. B.. 108(23). 2 indexed citations
8.
Derakhshandeh, Jaber, et al.. (2023). Developing TSV wet cleaning chemistry for quantum computing application. Microelectronic Engineering. 276. 112010–112010. 1 indexed citations
9.
Banerjee, Abhishek, Max Geier, Candice Thomas, et al.. (2023). Phase Asymmetry of Andreev Spectra from Cooper-Pair Momentum. Physical Review Letters. 131(19). 196301–196301. 22 indexed citations
10.
Sabonis, Deividas, et al.. (2023). Spin spectroscopy of a hybrid superconducting nanowire using side-coupled quantum dots. Physical review. B.. 108(5). 7 indexed citations
11.
Banerjee, Abhishek, Max Geier, Daniel S. Sanchez, et al.. (2023). Control of Andreev Bound States Using Superconducting Phase Texture. Physical Review Letters. 130(11). 116203–116203. 16 indexed citations
12.
Thomas, Candice, et al.. (2022). Spin-orbit coupling and electron scattering in high-quality InSb1xAsx quantum wells. Physical review. B.. 106(16). 10 indexed citations
13.
Sabonis, Deividas, et al.. (2022). Nonlocal conductance spectroscopy of Andreev bound states in gate-defined InAs/Al nanowires. Physical review. B.. 106(24). 24 indexed citations
14.
Wang, Tiantian, Candice Thomas, Geoffrey C. Gardner, et al.. (2022). Clean quantum point contacts in an InAs quantum well grown on a lattice-mismatched InP substrate. arXiv (Cornell University). 4 indexed citations
15.
Schuwalow, Sergej, Niels B. M. Schröter, Jan Gukelberger, et al.. (2020). Band Structure Extraction at Hybrid Narrow‐Gap Semiconductor–Metal Interfaces. Advanced Science. 8(4). 2003087–2003087. 18 indexed citations
16.
Nichele, Fabrizio, Elías Portolés, Antonio Fornieri, et al.. (2020). Relating Andreev Bound States and Supercurrents in Hybrid Josephson Junctions. Physical Review Letters. 124(22). 226801–226801. 64 indexed citations
17.
Whiticar, Alexander, Antonio Fornieri, Eoin O’Farrell, et al.. (2020). Coherent transport through a Majorana island in an Aharonov–Bohm interferometer. Nature Communications. 11(1). 3212–3212. 37 indexed citations
18.
Pauka, Sebastian, J. D. S. Witt, Claudine Nì. Allen, et al.. (2020). Repairing the surface of InAs-based topological heterostructures. Journal of Applied Physics. 128(11). 9 indexed citations
19.
Fornieri, Antonio, Alexander Whiticar, F. Setiawan, et al.. (2019). Evidence of topological superconductivity in planar Josephson junctions. Nature. 569(7754). 89–92. 277 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Vries, Folkert K. de, Candice Thomas, Ray Kallaher, et al.. (2019). Ballistic superconductivity and tunable π–junctions in InSb quantum wells. Nature Communications. 10(1). 3764–3764. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026