Camelia Chifu
About
In The Last Decade
Camelia Chifu
6 papers receiving 78 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
- Cancer Research 57
- Surgery 55
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 47
- Oncology 15
- Dermatology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Camelia Chifu
This map shows the geographic impact of Camelia Chifu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Camelia Chifu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Camelia Chifu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Camelia Chifu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Camelia Chifu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Camelia Chifu. The network helps show where Camelia Chifu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Camelia Chifu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Camelia Chifu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Camelia Chifu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Camelia Chifu. Camelia Chifu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | [Internal hernia--a rare cause of intestinal obstruction]. | 7 |
| 7 | [A rare complication of colostomy]. | 0 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.