Caitlyn Ellerbe
About
In The Last Decade
Caitlyn Ellerbe
12 papers receiving 430 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Hepatology 221
- Epidemiology 182
- Pharmacology 151
- Surgery 86
- Rehabilitation 64
Countries citing papers authored by Caitlyn Ellerbe
This map shows the geographic impact of Caitlyn Ellerbe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caitlyn Ellerbe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caitlyn Ellerbe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Caitlyn Ellerbe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caitlyn Ellerbe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caitlyn Ellerbe. The network helps show where Caitlyn Ellerbe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caitlyn Ellerbe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caitlyn Ellerbe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caitlyn Ellerbe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caitlyn Ellerbe. Caitlyn Ellerbe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72 | |
| 2 | 87 | |
| 3 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 81 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.