C. Whittle
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 8
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 2
-
- Geophysics and Sensor Technology 4
- Co-authors
- Steven FakharzadehGeorge PretiS. VitaleL. McCullerN. MavalvalaL. BarsottiM. EvansD. Ganapathy
- Journals
- Physical review. D (4 papers)Physical Review Letters (2 papers)Classical and Quantum Gravity (1 paper)Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (1 paper)The Astrophysical Journal Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
C. Whittle
11 papers receiving 234 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 97
- Sensory Systems 18
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 100
- Periodontics 11
- General Dentistry 3
Countries citing papers authored by C. Whittle
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Whittle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Whittle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Whittle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Whittle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Whittle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Whittle. The network helps show where C. Whittle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Whittle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 110 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 69 |
About C. Whittle
C. Whittle is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ocean Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (8 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (6 papers), Geophysics and Sensor Technology (4 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (2 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (2 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (97 citations), Sensory Systems (18 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (100 citations), Periodontics (11 citations) and General Dentistry (3 citations). C. Whittle has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Steven Fakharzadeh, George Preti, S. Vitale, L. McCuller, N. Mavalvala, L. Barsotti, M. Evans, D. Ganapathy, K. Komori and M. Tse. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Physical Review Letters, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.