C. Ulrich
- Surgery top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Rehabilitation
- Biomedical Engineering
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (8 papers)Bone fractures and treatments (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustriaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
C. Ulrich
27 papers receiving 446 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Surgery 437
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 302
- Epidemiology 65
- Rehabilitation 25
- Biomedical Engineering 20
Countries citing papers authored by C. Ulrich
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Ulrich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Ulrich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Ulrich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Ulrich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Ulrich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Ulrich. The network helps show where C. Ulrich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Ulrich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Ulrich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Ulrich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Ulrich. C. Ulrich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Metaphysärer Defektersatz mit Hydrosylapatitkeramik 3- bis 4-Jahresnachuntersuchungs-Ergebnisse | 1 |
| 6 | 85 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 118 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | Die Humerusverriegelungsmarknagelung nach Seidel Klinische Ergebnisse nach 100 Anwendungen | 6 |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | [Value of venting drilling for reduction of bone marrow spilling in cemented hip endoprosthesis]. | 7 |
| 18 | [Stable soft tissue reconstruction using an autochthonous muscle flap transposition and simultaneous bone reconstruction in post-traumatic and osteitis defects of the lower extremity]. | 2 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | [Primary allo-arthroplasty in acetabulum fractures]. | 5 |
About C. Ulrich
C. Ulrich is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (8 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (302 citations), Surgery (437 citations) and Rehabilitation (25 citations). C. Ulrich has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include C. Knop, A. Weckbach, P.-M. Hax, Axel Pommer, A. Wentzensen, O. Wörsdörfer, V. Bühren, L. Kinzl, F. Magerl and L. Claes. Their work appears in journals such as European Spine Journal, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma and Injury.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.