C. Thomas Lin

658 citations
14 papers · 484 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

C. Thomas Lin

14 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers

C. Thomas Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Statistics and Probability 232
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 84
  • Finance 54
  • Management Science and Operations Research 43
  • Artificial Intelligence 65
Replace Volker Mammitzsch with:
Volker Mammitzsch Germany
Michael E. Welch United States
E. J. Godolphin United Kingdom
Louis A. Jaeckel United States
Miguel A. Gómez–Villegas Spain
Stephen G. Walker United Kingdom
Haeran Cho United Kingdom
Miguel de Carvalho United Kingdom
Abhik Ghosh India
N. A. K. Amin Singapore
C. Thomas Lin relative to Volker Mammitzsch Germany Volker Mammitzsch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Volker Mammitzsch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Thomas Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Thomas Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Thomas Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Thomas Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Thomas Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Thomas Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Thomas Lin. The network helps show where C. Thomas Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside C. Thomas Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Thomas Lin Line = papers co-authored together C. Thomas Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1988151
2 198096
3 198886
4 199542
5 199122
6 200217
7 197616
8 199013
9 198210
10 198910
11 198010
12 19765
13 20103
14 19823

About C. Thomas Lin

C. Thomas Lin is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Molecular Biology, Numerical Analysis and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (7 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (6 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (3 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (2 papers), Mathematical Approximation and Integration (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (2 papers) and Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (232 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (84 citations), Finance (54 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (43 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (65 citations). C. Thomas Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Govind S. Mudholkar, Georgia Kollia, Marshall Freimer, Eugene N. Bush, Arthur A. Hancock, Deo Kumar Srivastava, Yogendra P. Chaubey, Celerino Abad‐Zapatero, Jason A. Segreti and Bryan F. Cox. Their work appears in journals such as Technometrics, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, Biometrika and Biopolymers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact