C. Teasdale
- Co-authors
- L E HughesR M WatkinsR WhiteheadLindsay K. CampbellJ. BarwellRobert G. NewcombeRobert HortonAnn Mander
- Topics
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers)BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
C. Teasdale
35 papers receiving 621 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Surgery 271
- Oncology 182
- Epidemiology 116
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 109
- Immunology 86
Countries citing papers authored by C. Teasdale
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Teasdale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Teasdale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Teasdale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Teasdale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Teasdale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Teasdale. The network helps show where C. Teasdale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Teasdale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Teasdale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Teasdale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Teasdale. C. Teasdale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | How long should suction drains stay in after breast surgery with axillary dissection? | 91 |
| 4 | Ultrasound localization of screen detected impalpable breast tumours. | 4 |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | Should endoscopic stenting be the initial treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? | 8 |
| 7 | Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the caecum. | 5 |
| 8 | 51 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma of the urinary bladder in association with recurrent urinary-tract infection. | 5 |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus arising within condyloma acuminatum. | 7 |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 77 | |
| 15 | A randomised controlled trial to compare local with general anaesthesia for short-stay inguinal hernia repair. | 63 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | The macrophage electrophoretic mobility (MEM) test--an investigation of its value as a routine laboratory test in the detection of malignant disease. | 3 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 63 |
About C. Teasdale
C. Teasdale is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Dermatology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 694 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (53 citations), Oncology (182 citations) and Surgery (271 citations). C. Teasdale has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include L E Hughes, R M Watkins, R Whitehead, Lindsay K. Campbell, J. Barwell, Robert G. Newcombe, Robert Horton, Ann Mander, Nicholas Williams and G P Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and British journal of surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.