David Webster

2.8k total citations
91 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

David Webster is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, David Webster has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Oncology, 18 papers in Surgery and 13 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in David Webster's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (12 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (12 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (9 papers). David Webster is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (12 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (12 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (9 papers). David Webster collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. David Webster's co-authors include L E Hughes, P. Trinder, Anthony W. Segal, Robert E. Mansel, E.C. Attwood, John P. Minton, R E Mansel, Kim J. Hodgson, E. Woodford‐Williams and R.E. Mansel and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Neurology and Cancer.

In The Last Decade

David Webster

87 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
David Webster United Kingdom	27	396	294	283	277	268	91	1.9k
T. Rytömaa Finland	29	209 0.5×	310 1.1×	261 0.9×	219 0.8×	562 2.1×	91	2.1k
Frederick P. Smith United States	30	324 0.8×	543 1.8×	203 0.7×	188 0.7×	219 0.8×	90	2.1k
Kristina Sundqvist Sweden	28	241 0.6×	209 0.7×	130 0.5×	231 0.8×	604 2.3×	109	2.7k
David Yeates United Kingdom	27	457 1.2×	319 1.1×	235 0.8×	112 0.4×	419 1.6×	48	2.8k
D. B. Thomas United States	26	230 0.6×	834 2.8×	260 0.9×	217 0.8×	174 0.6×	73	2.5k
David C. Poskanzer United States	23	332 0.8×	373 1.3×	376 1.3×	272 1.0×	490 1.8×	38	3.8k
John H. Ward United States	29	294 0.7×	588 2.0×	333 1.2×	275 1.0×	299 1.1×	74	2.3k
L. Brandt Sweden	36	336 0.8×	490 1.7×	422 1.5×	357 1.3×	530 2.0×	156	4.3k
Martin Levitt Canada	18	278 0.7×	847 2.9×	264 0.9×	141 0.5×	161 0.6×	36	1.8k
Micha Barchana Israel	30	274 0.7×	824 2.8×	316 1.1×	126 0.5×	382 1.4×	108	2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by David Webster

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Webster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Webster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Webster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Webster

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Webster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Webster. The network helps show where David Webster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Webster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Webster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Webster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Webster. David Webster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Srivastava, Anurag, J.P. Woodcock, Robert E. Mansel, et al.. (2012). Doppler Ultrasound Flowmetry Predicts 15 Year Outcome in Patients with Skin Melanoma. Indian Journal of Surgery. 74(4). 278–283. 10 indexed citations

Edwards, Richard, et al.. (2002). Incidence of nodes in completion mastectomy specimens following breast conservation and axillary clearance. British journal of surgery. 89(10). 1294–1295. 5 indexed citations

Maughan, Tim, Ilora Finlay, & David Webster. (2001). Portfolio Learning with Cancer Patients: An Integrated Module in Undergraduate Medical Education. Clinical Oncology. 13(1). 44–49. 21 indexed citations

Cochrane, R., et al.. (2000). Chronic haematoma as a late complication of cosmetic breast augmentation. The Breast. 9(3). 158–160. 11 indexed citations

Banerjee, D., et al.. (2000). Mastectomy follow-up by biennial mammograms: is it worthwhile?. The Breast. 9(2). 93–95. 4 indexed citations

Cochrane, R., Hemant Singhal, Helen Sweetland, et al.. (1999). The National Breast Referral Guidelines have cut down inappropriate referrals in the under 50s. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 25(3). 251–254. 9 indexed citations

Wright, I. A., Neil Pugh, K. Lyons, David Webster, & R.E. Mansel. (1998). Power Doppler in breast tumours: a comparison with conventional colour doppler imaging. European Journal of Ultrasound. 7(3). 175–181. 23 indexed citations

Roy, M K, et al.. (1998). Complications of latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 24(3). 162–165. 50 indexed citations

Gorey, Kevin M., Gordon Fehringer, Ethan Laukkanen, et al.. (1997). An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario, and Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan areas.. American Journal of Public Health. 87(7). 1156–1163. 93 indexed citations

10.

Cochrane, R., Hemant Singhal, I. Monypenny, et al.. (1997). Evaluation of general practitioner referrals to a specialist breast clinic according to the UK national guidelines. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 23(3). 198–201. 32 indexed citations

11.

Stuart, N, Jane Warwick, G. Blackledge, et al.. (1996). A randomised phase III cross-over study of tamoxifen versus megestrol acetate in advanced and recurrent breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer. 32(11). 1888–1892. 29 indexed citations

12.

Finlay, Ilora, Tim Maughan, & David Webster. (1994). Portfolio learning: a proposal for undergraduate cancer teaching. Medical Education. 28(1). 79–82. 11 indexed citations

13.

Webster, David, et al.. (1993). Is immediate postmastectomy reconstruction safe in the long-term?. PubMed. 19(4). 372–5. 27 indexed citations

14.

Peters, T. J., et al.. (1993). Student selection: are the school‐leaving A‐level grades in biology and chemistry important?. Medical Education. 27(1). 22–25. 7 indexed citations

15.

White, Priscilla, H. Adams, H M Sue-Ling, & David Webster. (1991). Case report: Gastroduodenal intussusception — An unusual cause of pancreatitis. Clinical Radiology. 44(5). 357–358. 11 indexed citations

16.

Mansel, Robert E., B J Harrison, William Sheridan, et al.. (1990). A Randomized Trial of Dietary Intervention with Essential Fatty Acids in Patients with Categorized Cysts. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 586(1). 288–294. 22 indexed citations

17.

Charny, Mark, Gareth Roberts, Paul A Beck, David Webster, & C J Roberts. (1990). How good are case notes in the audit of radiological investigations?. Clinical Radiology. 42(2). 118–121. 6 indexed citations

18.

Webster, David. (1986). Tembe-Thonga Kinship : The Marriage of Anthropology and History.. Cahiers d études africaines. 26(104). 611–632. 3 indexed citations

19.

Webster, David, Robert E. Mansel, & L E Hughes. (1984). Immediate reconstruction of the breast after mastectomy is it safe?. Cancer. 53(6). 1416–1419. 32 indexed citations

20.

Hughes, L E & David Webster. (1972). Treatment of early breast cancer.. BMJ. 3(5818). 111.1–111. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact