C. Stöeckl

16.0k total citations
284 papers, 5.9k citations indexed

About

C. Stöeckl is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Stöeckl has authored 284 papers receiving a total of 5.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 252 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 147 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 97 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in C. Stöeckl's work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (246 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (142 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (95 papers). C. Stöeckl is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (246 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (142 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (95 papers). C. Stöeckl collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. C. Stöeckl's co-authors include T. C. Sangster, D. D. Meyerhofer, V. Yu. Glebov, J. A. Delettrez, J. A. Frenje, R. D. Petrasso, J. F. Myatt, W. Seka, W. Theobald and V. N. Goncharov and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

C. Stöeckl

260 papers receiving 5.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Stöeckl United States 40 5.2k 2.9k 2.4k 1.8k 1.4k 284 5.9k
T. C. Sangster United States 42 6.1k 1.2× 3.4k 1.2× 2.7k 1.1× 2.3k 1.3× 1.4k 1.0× 260 6.8k
M. Roth Germany 31 4.8k 0.9× 3.1k 1.1× 2.7k 1.1× 2.0k 1.1× 630 0.5× 145 5.4k
P. K. Patel United States 39 4.4k 0.9× 2.8k 1.0× 2.3k 0.9× 1.9k 1.1× 744 0.5× 149 5.0k
J. P. Knauer United States 45 6.3k 1.2× 3.2k 1.1× 2.6k 1.1× 2.1k 1.2× 1.2k 0.9× 248 7.4k
R. Kodama Japan 40 4.5k 0.9× 2.9k 1.0× 3.2k 1.3× 1.5k 0.9× 788 0.6× 208 5.7k
S. P. Hatchett United States 30 5.6k 1.1× 3.6k 1.3× 2.9k 1.2× 2.3k 1.3× 764 0.6× 63 6.1k
P. A. Norreys United Kingdom 45 6.5k 1.2× 4.0k 1.4× 4.2k 1.7× 2.1k 1.2× 737 0.5× 169 7.2k
B. A. Hammel United States 36 3.4k 0.7× 2.2k 0.8× 2.1k 0.9× 1.5k 0.9× 606 0.4× 131 4.4k
J. A. Delettrez United States 39 4.1k 0.8× 2.9k 1.0× 2.3k 0.9× 1.4k 0.8× 568 0.4× 189 4.7k
R. D. Petrasso United States 39 4.2k 0.8× 1.9k 0.7× 1.4k 0.6× 1.6k 0.9× 1.1k 0.8× 255 5.1k

Countries citing papers authored by C. Stöeckl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Stöeckl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Stöeckl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Stöeckl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Stöeckl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Stöeckl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Stöeckl. The network helps show where C. Stöeckl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Stöeckl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Stöeckl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Stöeckl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Stöeckl. C. Stöeckl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Stutman, D., C. Stöeckl, I. A. Begishev, et al.. (2024). Referenceless, grating-based, single shot X-ray phase contrast imaging with optimized laser-driven K-α sources. Optics Express. 32(20). 34694–34694.
3.
4.
Johnson, M. Gatu, J. H. Kunimune, G.P.A. Berg, et al.. (2024). The next-generation magnetic recoil spectrometer (MRSnext) on OMEGA and NIF for diagnosing ion temperature, yield, areal density, and alpha heating. Review of Scientific Instruments. 95(8). 2 indexed citations
5.
Forrest, C. J., et al.. (2024). Nonlinear light-output calibration of the oxygenated xylene scintillators used in OMEGA neutron time-of-flight spectrometers. Review of Scientific Instruments. 95(10). 1 indexed citations
6.
Patel, D., W. Theobald, R. Betti, et al.. (2024). Mitigation of hot-electron preheat from the two-plasmon-decay instability using silicon-doped plastic shells in direct-drive implosions on OMEGA. Physics of Plasmas. 31(11). 1 indexed citations
7.
Woo, K. M., W. Theobald, R. Betti, et al.. (2024). Three-dimensional reconstruction of laser-direct-drive inertial confinement fusion hot-spot plasma from x-ray diagnostics on the OMEGA laser facility (invited). Review of Scientific Instruments. 95(10). 1 indexed citations
8.
Rosenberg, M. J., A. A. Solodov, C. Stöeckl, et al.. (2023). Hot electron preheat in hydrodynamically scaled direct-drive inertial confinement fusion implosions on the NIF and OMEGA. Physics of Plasmas. 30(7). 4 indexed citations
9.
Glebov, V. Yu., C. J. Forrest, J. P. Knauer, et al.. (2022). A new neutron time-of-flight detector for yield and ion-temperature measurements at the OMEGA Laser Facility. Review of Scientific Instruments. 93(9). 93522–93522. 1 indexed citations
10.
Sio, H., O. Larroche, A. Bose, et al.. (2022). Fuel–shell mix and yield degradation in kinetic shock-driven inertial confinement fusion implosions. Physics of Plasmas. 29(7). 5 indexed citations
11.
Mannion, Owen, Aidan Crilly, C. J. Forrest, et al.. (2022). Measurements of the temperature and velocity of the dense fuel layer in inertial confinement fusion experiments. Physical review. E. 105(5). 55205–55205. 7 indexed citations
12.
Patel, D., A. Lees, C. Stöeckl, et al.. (2022). Predicting hot electron generation in inertial confinement fusion with particle-in-cell simulations. Physical review. E. 106(5). 55214–55214. 5 indexed citations
13.
Scott, G. G., D. Mariscal, R. F. Heeter, et al.. (2022). Demonstration of plasma mirror capability for the OMEGA Extended Performance laser system. Review of Scientific Instruments. 93(4). 43006–43006.
14.
Иванов, В. В., A. V. Maximov, A. L. Astanovitskiy, et al.. (2020). Study of laser-driven magnetic fields with a continuous wave Faraday rotation diagnostic. Physics of Plasmas. 27(3). 6 indexed citations
15.
Sio, H., O. Larroche, S. Atzeni, et al.. (2019). Probing ion species separation and ion thermal decoupling in shock-driven implosions using multiple nuclear reaction histories. Physics of Plasmas. 26(7). 5 indexed citations
16.
Jarrott, L. C., M. S. Wei, C. McGuffey, et al.. (2017). Calibration and characterization of a highly efficient spectrometer in von Hamos geometry for 7-10 keV x-rays. Review of Scientific Instruments. 88(4). 43110–43110. 17 indexed citations
17.
Hoffman, N. M., G. B. Zimmerman, Kim Molvig, et al.. (2015). Approximate models for the ion-kinetic regime in inertial-confinement-fusion capsule implosions. Physics of Plasmas. 22(5). 52707–52707. 38 indexed citations
18.
Rosenberg, M. J., C. K. Li, W. Fox, et al.. (2015). First experiments probing the collision of parallel magnetic fields using laser-produced plasmas. Physics of Plasmas. 22(4). 5 indexed citations
19.
Theobald, W., C. Stöeckl, T. C. Sangster, et al.. (2004). X-Ray Line Emission Spectroscopy of 100-TW Laser-Pulse--Generated Plasmas for Backlighter Development of Cryogenic Implosion Capsules. APS. 46. 1 indexed citations
20.
Delettrez, J. A., V. Yu. Glebov, F. J. Marshall, et al.. (1999). Effect of Beam Smoothing and Pulse Shape on the Implosion of DD-Filled CH Shell Targets on OMEGA. APS. 41.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. C. Sangster Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Roth Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. K. Patel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. P. Knauer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Kodama Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. P. Hatchett Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. A. Norreys Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. A. Hammel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. A. Delettrez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. D. Petrasso
Rankless by CCL
2026