C. Stöeckl
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.2%
- Mechanics of Materials top 0.2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 1%
- Geophysics top 1%
- Radiation top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- T. C. SangsterD. D. MeyerhoferV. Yu. GlebovJ. A. DelettrezJ. A. FrenjeR. D. PetrassoJ. F. MyattW. Seka
- Topics
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (246 papers)Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (142 papers)High-pressure geophysics and materials (95 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
C. Stöeckl
260 papers receiving 5.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 5.2k
- Mechanics of Materials 2.9k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.4k
- Geophysics 1.8k
- Radiation 1.4k
Countries citing papers authored by C. Stöeckl
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Stöeckl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Stöeckl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Stöeckl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Stöeckl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Stöeckl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Stöeckl. The network helps show where C. Stöeckl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Stöeckl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Stöeckl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Stöeckl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Stöeckl. C. Stöeckl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | X-Ray Line Emission Spectroscopy of 100-TW Laser-Pulse--Generated Plasmas for Backlighter Development of Cryogenic Implosion Capsules | 1 |
| 20 | Effect of Beam Smoothing and Pulse Shape on the Implosion of DD-Filled CH Shell Targets on OMEGA | 0 |
About C. Stöeckl
C. Stöeckl is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Geophysics, having authored 284 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (246 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (142 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (95 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (5.2k citations), Radiation (1.4k citations) and Geophysics (1.8k citations). C. Stöeckl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include T. C. Sangster, D. D. Meyerhofer, V. Yu. Glebov, J. A. Delettrez, J. A. Frenje, R. D. Petrasso, J. F. Myatt, W. Seka, W. Theobald and V. N. Goncharov. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.