J. Peebles

1.1k total citations
41 papers, 389 citations indexed

About

J. Peebles is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Peebles has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 389 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 23 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 18 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in J. Peebles's work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (38 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (23 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (18 papers). J. Peebles is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (38 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (23 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (18 papers). J. Peebles collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Taiwan. J. Peebles's co-authors include R. Betti, F. N. Beg, W. Theobald, Daniel Barnak, J. R. Davies, E. M. Campbell, M. S. Wei, A. Casner, M. J. Bonino and E. C. Hansen and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and Review of Scientific Instruments.

In The Last Decade

J. Peebles

38 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Peebles United States 12 327 208 166 135 38 41 389
M. Bailly-Grandvaux United States 12 418 1.3× 276 1.3× 232 1.4× 138 1.0× 42 1.1× 39 468
T. C. Moore United States 7 286 0.9× 169 0.8× 211 1.3× 77 0.6× 43 1.1× 10 398
A. L. Milder United States 11 238 0.7× 170 0.8× 181 1.1× 75 0.6× 28 0.7× 25 314
D. J. Stark United States 10 360 1.1× 173 0.8× 191 1.2× 74 0.5× 49 1.3× 33 393
A. N. Gritsuk Russia 12 353 1.1× 151 0.7× 106 0.6× 89 0.7× 34 0.9× 58 418
N. Niasse United Kingdom 12 307 0.9× 147 0.7× 117 0.7× 47 0.3× 88 2.3× 28 358
S. Kerr United States 13 330 1.0× 176 0.8× 156 0.9× 105 0.8× 45 1.2× 41 431
Z.-H. He United States 11 348 1.1× 195 0.9× 265 1.6× 63 0.5× 30 0.8× 16 431
A. Pipahl Germany 9 484 1.5× 292 1.4× 267 1.6× 199 1.5× 26 0.7× 16 500
R. Presura United States 13 357 1.1× 203 1.0× 150 0.9× 73 0.5× 83 2.2× 76 477

Countries citing papers authored by J. Peebles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Peebles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Peebles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Peebles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Peebles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Peebles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Peebles. The network helps show where J. Peebles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Peebles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Peebles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Peebles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Peebles. J. Peebles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Peebles, J., J. R. Davies, Daniel Barnak, et al.. (2023). Demonstration of neutron-yield enhancement by laser preheating and magnetization of laser-driven cylindrical implosions. Physics of Plasmas. 30(8). 1 indexed citations
3.
Scott, G. G., D. Mariscal, R. F. Heeter, et al.. (2022). Demonstration of plasma mirror capability for the OMEGA Extended Performance laser system. Review of Scientific Instruments. 93(4). 43006–43006.
4.
Gorman, M. G., S. J. Ali, P. M. Celliers, et al.. (2022). Measurement of shock roughness due to phase plate speckle imprinting relevant for x-ray diffraction experiments on 3rd and 4th generation light sources. Journal of Applied Physics. 132(17). 6 indexed citations
5.
Leal, L. S., A. V. Maximov, E. C. Hansen, et al.. (2022). Effect of laser preheat in magnetized liner inertial fusion at OMEGA. Physics of Plasmas. 29(4). 4 indexed citations
6.
Colaïtis, A., W. Theobald, A. Casner, et al.. (2021). Experimental characterization of hot-electron emission and shock dynamics in the context of the shock ignition approach to inertial confinement fusion. Physics of Plasmas. 28(10). 103302–103302. 9 indexed citations
7.
Peebles, J., et al.. (2021). Magnetically collimated relativistic charge-neutral electron–positron beams from high-power lasers. Physics of Plasmas. 28(7). 8 indexed citations
8.
Dozières, M., Stephanie B. Hansen, P. Forestier-Colleoni, et al.. (2020). Characterization of an imploding cylindrical plasma for electron transport studies using x-ray emission spectroscopy. Physics of Plasmas. 27(2). 3 indexed citations
9.
Barnak, Daniel, J. R. Davies, D. R. Harding, et al.. (2020). Azimuthal Uniformity of Cylindrical Implosions on OMEGA. APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. 2020. 2 indexed citations
10.
Betti, R., A. Casner, V. Gopalaswamy, et al.. (2020). Hybrid target design for imprint mitigation in direct-drive inertial confinement fusion. Physical review. E. 101(6). 63207–63207. 9 indexed citations
11.
Zhang, S., C. Krauland, J. Peebles, et al.. (2020). Experimental study of hot electron generation in shock ignition relevant high-intensity regime with large scale hot plasmas. Physics of Plasmas. 27(2). 14 indexed citations
12.
Peebles, J., S. X. Hu, W. Theobald, et al.. (2019). Direct-drive measurements of laser-imprint-induced shock velocity nonuniformities. Physical review. E. 99(6). 63208–63208. 19 indexed citations
13.
Li, Jun, P. Forestier-Colleoni, M. Bailly-Grandvaux, et al.. (2019). Laser-driven acceleration of quasi-monoenergetic, near-collimated titanium ions via a transparency-enhanced acceleration scheme. New Journal of Physics. 21(10). 103005–103005. 5 indexed citations
14.
Peebles, J., J. R. Davies, Daniel Barnak, et al.. (2018). Characterizing Magnetic and Electric Fields from Laser-Driven Coils Using Axial Proton Probing. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2018. 1 indexed citations
15.
Peebles, J., J. R. Davies, Daniel Barnak, et al.. (2018). Scaled Neutron Yield Enhancement Experiments Using the Laser Driven MagLIF Platform on the OMEGA Laser. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2018. 1 indexed citations
16.
Peebles, J.. (2017). Impact of Pre-Plasma on Electron Generation and Transport in Laser Plasma Interactions. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 1 indexed citations
17.
Theobald, W., A. Bose, Rui Yan, et al.. (2017). Enhanced hot-electron production and strong-shock generation in hydrogen-rich ablators for shock ignition. Physics of Plasmas. 24(12). 15 indexed citations
18.
Williams, G. J., Daniel Barnak, G. Fiksel, et al.. (2016). Target material dependence of positron generation from high intensity laser-matter interactions. Physics of Plasmas. 23(12). 16 indexed citations
19.
Brejnholt, Nicolai F., G. J. Williams, Jaebum Park, et al.. (2015). Reflective multilayer optic as hard X-ray diagnostic on laser-plasma experiment. Review of Scientific Instruments. 86(1). 13110–13110. 6 indexed citations
20.
Nora, R., W. Theobald, R. Betti, et al.. (2015). Gigabar Spherical Shock Generation on the OMEGA Laser. Physical Review Letters. 114(4). 45001–45001. 83 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026