C. Shannon Stokes

1.3k total citations
53 papers, 946 citations indexed

About

C. Shannon Stokes is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Demography and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Shannon Stokes has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 946 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Gender Studies, 15 papers in Demography and 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in C. Shannon Stokes's work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (17 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (12 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (9 papers). C. Shannon Stokes is often cited by papers focused on Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (17 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (12 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (9 papers). C. Shannon Stokes collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Egypt. C. Shannon Stokes's co-authors include Diane K. McLaughlin, Michael K. Miller, Nan E. Johnson, Parfait M. Eloundou‐Enyegue, William B. Clifford, P. Neal Ritchey, Leif Jensen, William Sambisa, Robert H. Fiser and Frank L. Farmer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and American Journal of Public Health.

In The Last Decade

C. Shannon Stokes

49 papers receiving 822 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Shannon Stokes United States 18 351 318 268 244 217 53 946
Albert I. Hermalin United States 22 596 1.7× 406 1.3× 380 1.4× 482 2.0× 459 2.1× 53 1.4k
Ted Joyce United States 19 253 0.7× 437 1.4× 307 1.1× 177 0.7× 219 1.0× 31 1.5k
Gretchen A. Condran United States 13 496 1.4× 343 1.1× 217 0.8× 217 0.9× 305 1.4× 26 1.1k
Steffen Reinhold Germany 15 489 1.4× 382 1.2× 135 0.5× 308 1.3× 171 0.8× 35 955
Nasra M. Shah Kuwait 20 661 1.9× 250 0.8× 180 0.7× 75 0.3× 236 1.1× 86 1.2k
Jenna Nobles United States 19 510 1.5× 296 0.9× 209 0.8× 182 0.7× 198 0.9× 44 1.1k
Judith Banister United States 17 515 1.5× 181 0.6× 736 2.7× 98 0.4× 291 1.3× 29 1.3k
Inge Hutter Netherlands 19 258 0.7× 305 1.0× 134 0.5× 92 0.4× 127 0.6× 56 970
James C. Cramer United States 11 219 0.6× 159 0.5× 196 0.7× 95 0.4× 131 0.6× 17 760
Christine E. Peterson United States 12 191 0.5× 163 0.5× 105 0.4× 111 0.5× 78 0.4× 54 584

Countries citing papers authored by C. Shannon Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Shannon Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Shannon Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Shannon Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Shannon Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Shannon Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Shannon Stokes. The network helps show where C. Shannon Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Shannon Stokes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Shannon Stokes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Shannon Stokes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Shannon Stokes. C. Shannon Stokes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jensen, Leif, et al.. (2010). School Attendance in Nigeria: Understanding the Impact and Intersection of Gender, Urban‐Rural Residence, and Socioeconomic Status. Comparative Education Review. 54(2). 295–319. 62 indexed citations
2.
Sparks, P. Johnelle, Diane K. McLaughlin, & C. Shannon Stokes. (2009). Differential Neonatal and Postneonatal Infant Mortality Rates Across US Counties: The Role of Socioeconomic Conditions and Rurality. The Journal of Rural Health. 25(4). 332–341. 27 indexed citations
3.
Stokes, C. Shannon & Parfait M. Eloundou‐Enyegue. (2007). Demographic transitions and children's resources: growth or divergence?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
4.
Stokes, C. Shannon & Parfait M. Eloundou‐Enyegue. (2004). Teen Fertility and Gender Inequality in Education: A Contextual Hypothesis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
5.
Farmer, Frank L., et al.. (1991). Poverty, Primary Care and Age‐Specific Mortality*. The Journal of Rural Health. 7(2). 153–169. 46 indexed citations
6.
Stokes, C. Shannon, et al.. (1988). Agricultural chemical use and cancer mortality in selected rural counties in the U.S.A.. Journal of Rural Studies. 4(3). 239–247. 11 indexed citations
7.
Stokes, C. Shannon, et al.. (1986). Is the Relationship Between Landholding and Fertility Spurious? A Response to Cain. Population Studies. 40(2). 305–311. 10 indexed citations
8.
Stokes, C. Shannon & Michael K. Miller. (1985). A Methodological Review of Fifty Years of Research in "Rural Sociology.".. Rural Sociology. 50(4). 18 indexed citations
9.
Miller, Michael K. & C. Shannon Stokes. (1985). Teenage fertility, socioeconomic status and infant mortality. Journal of Biosocial Science. 17(2). 147–155. 8 indexed citations
10.
Stokes, C. Shannon, et al.. (1984). Rural development and human fertility. 26 indexed citations
11.
Stokes, C. Shannon, et al.. (1983). Female Employment and Reproductive Behavior in Taiwan, 1980. Demography. 20(3). 313–331. 10 indexed citations
12.
Stokes, C. Shannon, et al.. (1983). Farm Size, Land Ownership, and Fertility in Rural Egypt. Land Economics. 59(4). 393–393. 20 indexed citations
13.
Stokes, C. Shannon, et al.. (1982). The influence of individual and community-level child mortality on fertility in Egypt. Studies in Comparative International Development. 17(2). 74–86. 6 indexed citations
14.
Miller, Michael K. & C. Shannon Stokes. (1978). Health Status, Health Resources, and Consolidated Structural Parameters: Implications for Public Health Care Policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 19(3). 263–263. 22 indexed citations
15.
Stokes, C. Shannon, et al.. (1977). Sex-Role Ideology, Selected Life Plans, and Family Size Preferences: Further Evidence. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 8(3). 391–400.
16.
Stokes, C. Shannon, et al.. (1977). Race, Education, and Fertility: A Comparison of Black-White Reproductive Behavior. Phylon (1960-). 38(2). 160–160. 7 indexed citations
17.
Stokes, C. Shannon, et al.. (1976). Socialization, Firearms, and Suicide. Social Problems. 23(5). 622–629. 8 indexed citations
18.
Stokes, C. Shannon & P. Neal Ritchey. (1974). Some Further Observations on Childlessness and Color. Journal of Black Studies. 5(2). 203–209. 3 indexed citations
19.
Ritchey, P. Neal & C. Shannon Stokes. (1974). Correlates of Childlessness and Expectations to Remain Childless: U.S. 1967. Social Forces. 52(3). 349–356. 21 indexed citations
20.
Stokes, C. Shannon. (1972). Religious Differentials in Reproductive Behavior: A Replication and Extension. Sociological Analysis. 33(1). 26–26. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026