C. Sánchez Acedo
About
In The Last Decade
C. Sánchez Acedo
3 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 197
- Cancer Research 154
- Dermatology 139
- Oncology 88
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 81
Countries citing papers authored by C. Sánchez Acedo
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Sánchez Acedo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Sánchez Acedo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Sánchez Acedo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Sánchez Acedo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Sánchez Acedo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Sánchez Acedo. The network helps show where C. Sánchez Acedo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Sánchez Acedo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Sánchez Acedo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Sánchez Acedo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Sánchez Acedo. C. Sánchez Acedo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 36 | |
| 3 | Importancia actual de las leismaniosis en España | 1 |
| 4 | 286 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.