C. S. Scearce
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Geophysics top 10%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Oceanography
- Co-authors
- N. F. NessS. CantaranoK. W. BehannonJ. P. HeppnerT. L. SkillmanJohn M. WilcoxL. F. BurlagaF. Mariani
- Topics
- Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (11 papers)Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (10 papers)Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (7 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresJournal of the Physical Society of JapanNASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
C. S. Scearce
10 papers receiving 536 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 895
- Molecular Biology 445
- Geophysics 79
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 63
- Oceanography 25
Countries citing papers authored by C. S. Scearce
This map shows the geographic impact of C. S. Scearce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. S. Scearce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. S. Scearce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. S. Scearce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. S. Scearce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. S. Scearce. The network helps show where C. S. Scearce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. S. Scearce
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. S. Scearce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. S. Scearce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. S. Scearce. C. S. Scearce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Rome-GSFC magnetic field experiment for Helios A and B /E 3/ | 13 |
| 2 | Magnetic field experiment Pioneers 6, 7 and 8 | 1 |
| 3 | Probable observations of the geomagnetic tail at 103 RE by Pioneer 7 | 5 |
| 4 | 45 | |
| 5 | 156 | |
| 6 | 63 | |
| 7 | 101 | |
| 8 | Initial results of the Imp-1 magnetic field experiment | 1 |
| 9 | A summary of results from the imp-i magnetic field experiment | 19 |
| 10 | 352 | |
| 11 | Explorer X Magnetic Field Results | 1 |
| 12 | 135 | |
| 13 | Magnetic Field Fluctuations on the Earth and in Space | 28 |
About C. S. Scearce
C. S. Scearce is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Oceanography, having authored 13 papers that have together received 920 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (11 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (10 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (895 citations), Molecular Biology (445 citations) and Geophysics (79 citations). C. S. Scearce has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include N. F. Ness, S. Cantarano, K. W. Behannon, J. P. Heppner, T. L. Skillman, John M. Wilcox, N. F. Ness, L. F. Burlaga, F. Mariani and R. Terenzi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan and NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.