Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Magnetic loop behind an interplanetary shock: Voyager, Helios, and IMP 8 observations
19811.2k citationsL. F. Burlaga, E. C. Sittler et al.Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheresprofile →
The WIND magnetic field investigation
19951.2k citationsR. P. Lepping, M. H. Acuña et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Mariani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Mariani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Mariani more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Mariani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Mariani. The network helps show where F. Mariani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Mariani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Mariani.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Mariani based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F. Mariani. F. Mariani is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lepping, R. P., Á. Szabó, L. F. Burlaga, et al.. (1999). Some Peculiar Properties of Magnetic Clouds as Observed by the WIND Spacecraft. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).1 indexed citations
4.
Villante, U., M. De Lauretis, P. Francia, et al.. (1997). The Earth's passage of a magnetic cloud on January 10 - 11, 1997: a preliminary analysis of geomagnetic field fluctuations at a low latitude and an Antarctic station.. 147–152.2 indexed citations
5.
Neubauer, F. M., Karl‐Heinz Glaßmeier, M. H. Acuña, et al.. (1990). Giotto magnetic field observations at the outbound quasi-parallel bow shock of Comet Halley. Annales Geophysicae. 8. 463–471.22 indexed citations
Neubauer, F. M., G. Musmann, M. H. Acuña, et al.. (1983). The Giotto magnetic field investigation. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1070. 145–154.8 indexed citations
8.
Bruno, R. & F. Mariani. (1982). Interplanetary Alfvenic fluctuations: A statistical study of the directional variations of the magnetic field. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 228. 13050.3 indexed citations
9.
Bruno, R., M. Dobrowolny, F. Mariani, & N. F. Ness. (1981). Radial evolution of power spectra of interplanetary Alfvenic turbulence. STIN. 82. 18097.4 indexed citations
Burlaga, L. F., E. C. Sittler, F. Mariani, & R. Schwenn. (1981). Magnetic loop behind an interplanetary shock: Voyager, Helios, and IMP 8 observations. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 86(A8). 6673–6684.1215 indexed citations breakdown →
Mariani, F., N. F. Ness, L. F. Burlaga, & S. Cantarano. (1976). Variations of the interplanetary magnetic field intensity between 1 and 0.3 AU. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 675.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.