C. S. CORKER
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Genetics
- Immunology
- Co-authors
- Helen McLeanK. P. McNattyD. T. BairdA.E. BoltonM. A. F. MurrayHarvey H. FederK. Brown-GrantD. W. Davidson
- Topics
- Hormonal and reproductive studies (5 papers)Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (5 papers)Estrogen and related hormone effects (4 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismThe British Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
C. S. CORKER
22 papers receiving 796 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Reproductive Medicine 385
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 247
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 241
- Genetics 167
- Immunology 133
Countries citing papers authored by C. S. CORKER
This map shows the geographic impact of C. S. CORKER's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. S. CORKER with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. S. CORKER more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. S. CORKER
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. S. CORKER. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. S. CORKER. The network helps show where C. S. CORKER may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. S. CORKER
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. S. CORKER. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. S. CORKER based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. S. CORKER. C. S. CORKER is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 152 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 207 | |
| 4 | 81 | |
| 5 | 128 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 91 | |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About C. S. CORKER
C. S. CORKER is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Reproductive Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 23 papers that have together received 929 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hormonal and reproductive studies (5 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (5 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (385 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (247 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (50 citations). C. S. CORKER has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Helen McLean, K. P. McNatty, D. T. Baird, A.E. Bolton, M. A. F. Murray, Harvey H. Feder, K. Brown-Grant, D. W. Davidson, Eileen A. Michie and William Hunter. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.