C. Phillips

412 total citations
15 papers, 69 citations indexed

About

C. Phillips is a scholar working on Information Systems, Human-Computer Interaction and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Phillips has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 69 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Information Systems, 9 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 8 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in C. Phillips's work include Usability and User Interface Design (9 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (4 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (4 papers). C. Phillips is often cited by papers focused on Usability and User Interface Design (9 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (4 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (4 papers). C. Phillips collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand. C. Phillips's co-authors include David Page, David Griffin, Mark Apperley, Chris Scogings and Susie Adams and has published in prestigious journals such as Interacting with Computers.

In The Last Decade

C. Phillips

13 papers receiving 64 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C. Phillips New Zealand	5	37	35	21	21	10	15	69
Pedro J. Molina United States	5	39 1.1×	37 1.1×	21 1.0×	8 0.4×	7 0.7×	9	75
Silvia Berti Italy	6	27 0.7×	30 0.9×	17 0.8×	16 0.8×	3 0.3×	11	91
Tim Clerckx Belgium	4	14 0.4×	33 0.9×	19 0.9×	12 0.6×	3 0.3×	6	51
Jan Van den Bergh Belgium	4	16 0.4×	20 0.6×	8 0.4×	7 0.3×	2 0.2×	7	43
Maider Azanza Spain	5	80 2.2×	8 0.2×	60 2.9×	44 2.1×	2 0.2×	12	101
Andrés Fortier Argentina	5	32 0.9×	13 0.4×	10 0.5×	2 0.1×		11	60
Patrick Albers France	2	70 1.9×	13 0.4×	51 2.4×	2 0.1×	11 1.1×	3	81
Tim Wright New Zealand	3	16 0.4×	9 0.3×	3 0.1×	4 0.2×	5 0.5×	9	27
Georges Grosz France	4	46 1.2×	2 0.1×	23 1.1×	14 0.7×	38 3.8×	7	67
Marlène Villanova-Oliver France	5	28 0.8×	6 0.2×	15 0.7×	3 0.1×	1 0.1×	18	77

Countries citing papers authored by C. Phillips

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Phillips

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Phillips. The network helps show where C. Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Phillips

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Phillips. C. Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

1.

Phillips, C., et al.. (2011). UMM. 33–40. 1 indexed citations

2.

Phillips, C., et al.. (2005). The Integration of HCI and Software Engineering. 399–401. 2 indexed citations

3.

Phillips, C., et al.. (2004). What makes a good user interface pattern language. 91–100. 13 indexed citations

4.

Phillips, C., et al.. (2003). Validating user interface pattern languages. 125–126. 2 indexed citations

5.

Phillips, C., et al.. (2002). The design of the client user interface for a meta object-oriented CASE tool. 32. 156–167. 4 indexed citations

6.

Phillips, C., et al.. (2002). The usability component of a framework for the evaluation of OO CASE tools. 134–141. 13 indexed citations

7.

Phillips, C., et al.. (2002). Designing the client user interface for a methodology independent OO CASE tool. 32. 106–113.

8.

Phillips, C., et al.. (2002). Extending UML use case modelling to support graphical user interface design. 5. 48–57. 11 indexed citations

9.

Phillips, C.. (2002). Towards a task-based methodology for designing GUIs. 2. 424–431.

10.

Phillips, C., et al.. (2002). Towards the integration of software engineering and HCI education: a cross-disciplinary approach. 145–150. 2 indexed citations

11.

Phillips, C., et al.. (2002). Human-computer interaction in software engineering courses. 520–521. 1 indexed citations

12.

Phillips, C., et al.. (2002). Task and dialogue modelling: bridging the divide with Lean Cuisine+. 5. 81–87. 2 indexed citations

13.

Scogings, Chris & C. Phillips. (2001). Linking tasks, dialogue and GUI design: a method involving UML and Lean Cuisine+. Interacting with Computers. 14(1). 69–86. 4 indexed citations

14.

Phillips, C.. (1994). Review of graphical notations for specifying direct manipulation interfaces. Interacting with Computers. 6(4). 411–431. 10 indexed citations

15.

Phillips, C. & Mark Apperley. (1991). Direct manipulation interaction tasks: a Macintosh-based analysis. Interacting with Computers. 3(1). 9–26. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact