C. P. Srivastava

448 total citations
57 papers, 327 citations indexed

About

C. P. Srivastava is a scholar working on Plant Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, C. P. Srivastava has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 327 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Plant Science, 11 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 9 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in C. P. Srivastava's work include Agricultural pest management studies (36 papers), Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies (34 papers) and Agricultural Economics and Practices (9 papers). C. P. Srivastava is often cited by papers focused on Agricultural pest management studies (36 papers), Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies (34 papers) and Agricultural Economics and Practices (9 papers). C. P. Srivastava collaborates with scholars based in India, Spain and Mali. C. P. Srivastava's co-authors include Michel Pimbert, R. P. Srivastava, Ramesh Chand, William J. Reed, Kusum Yadav, B. D. Singh, C S Pawar, P. K. Singh, Anil Kumar Singh and M. P. Kaushik and has published in prestigious journals such as Euphytica, Journal of Medical Entomology and Plant Breeding.

In The Last Decade

C. P. Srivastava

49 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. P. Srivastava India 10 265 82 60 37 25 57 327
S. K. Chakrabarty India 6 215 0.8× 43 0.5× 53 0.9× 25 0.7× 7 0.3× 84 260
K. Anitha India 7 191 0.7× 42 0.5× 40 0.7× 24 0.6× 11 0.4× 62 238
Mildred Ochwo‐Ssemakula Uganda 12 340 1.3× 36 0.4× 40 0.7× 11 0.3× 11 0.4× 44 374
H. Bouwmeester Tanzania 10 387 1.5× 114 1.4× 30 0.5× 11 0.3× 36 1.4× 11 415
Mati Koppel Estonia 11 313 1.2× 17 0.2× 44 0.7× 19 0.5× 15 0.6× 31 347
Resham Bahadur Thapa Nepal 8 124 0.5× 120 1.5× 43 0.7× 44 1.2× 46 1.8× 55 268
P. S. Soumia India 10 199 0.8× 69 0.8× 52 0.9× 33 0.9× 5 0.2× 33 258
Mathieu Anatole Tele Ayenan Ghana 11 268 1.0× 27 0.3× 55 0.9× 48 1.3× 31 1.2× 27 322
Paul Kusolwa Tanzania 10 234 0.9× 32 0.4× 51 0.8× 13 0.4× 26 1.0× 28 300
J. A. López-Pérez Spain 11 368 1.4× 69 0.8× 30 0.5× 18 0.5× 8 0.3× 31 402

Countries citing papers authored by C. P. Srivastava

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. P. Srivastava's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. P. Srivastava with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. P. Srivastava more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. P. Srivastava

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. P. Srivastava. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. P. Srivastava. The network helps show where C. P. Srivastava may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. P. Srivastava

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. P. Srivastava. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. P. Srivastava based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. P. Srivastava. C. P. Srivastava is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Singh, Ajay & C. P. Srivastava. (2015). Effect of plant types on grain yield and lodging resistance in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The). 75(1). 69–74. 6 indexed citations
3.
Srivastava, C. P., et al.. (2013). Forecasting of Productivity and Pod Damage by Helicoverpa armigera using Artificial Neural Network Model in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology. 6(2). 335–340. 10 indexed citations
4.
Srivastava, C. P., et al.. (2012). Genetic variability studies for lodging resistance and yield attributes in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Food Legumes. 25(3). 179–182. 8 indexed citations
5.
Srivastava, C. P., et al.. (2012). Mechanism of resistance in long duration Pigeon pea against pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa). Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 20(2). 290–293.
6.
Srivastava, C. P., et al.. (2011). Insect pest management in pigeon pea in Indian scenario: a critical review.. Indian Journal of Entomology. 73(1). 63–75. 4 indexed citations
7.
Srivastava, C. P., et al.. (2010). Forecasting of Helicoverpa armigera populations and impact of climate change. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 80(1). 3–10. 18 indexed citations
8.
Srivastava, C. P., et al.. (2010). Seasonal incidence of Pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) on Long duration Pigeon pea, (Cajanus cajan L.). Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 18(2). 394–399.
9.
Yadav, Kusum, et al.. (2010). Analysis of genetic divergence in pea (Pisum sativum L.) using quantitative traits and RAPD markers. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The). 70(4). 363–369. 9 indexed citations
10.
Srivastava, C. P., et al.. (2009). Genetic variability in the segregating generations and the breeding strategies for selection to improve yield and resistance to rust in pea. Journal of Food Legumes. 22(3). 158–161. 3 indexed citations
11.
Srivastava, C. P., et al.. (2009). Line × tester analysis in pea (Pisum sativum L.).. International Journal of Plant Sciences Muzaffarnagar. 4(1). 233–236. 9 indexed citations
12.
Srivastava, C. P., et al.. (2002). Bioefficacy of Chemical and Biorational Insecticides Against Incidence of Legume Pod Borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) in Short Duration Pigeonpea*. Indian journal of plant protection. 30(1). 22–25. 9 indexed citations
13.
Srivastava, C. P., et al.. (2002). Genetic variability and correlations among yield and yield characters over two environments in pea. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 36(1). 53–56. 2 indexed citations
14.
Srivastava, C. P. & S. Mohapatra. (2002). Field screening of pigeonpea genotypes for resistance to major insect pests.. 13. 202–203. 1 indexed citations
15.
Srivastava, C. P., et al.. (2001). LEVELS OF HETEROSIS OVER ENVIRONMENTS IN PEA. Legume Research - An International Journal. 24(3). 203–204.
16.
Srivastava, C. P., et al.. (2000). Heterosis for powdery mildew resistance over two environments in line × tester crosses of pea (Pisum sativum L.).. Annals of Agri Bio Research. 5(1). 83–86. 1 indexed citations
17.
Singh, U. P., M. Ganesh, & C. P. Srivastava. (1997). Detection of epistasis and estimation of components of genetic variation applying modified triple test cross analysis using two testers in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The). 57(2). 138–142. 6 indexed citations
18.
Srivastava, C. P. & R. P. Srivastava. (1990). Estimation of avoidable loss in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) due to gram-pod borer (Heliothis armigera) in Rajasthan. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 60(7). 494–496. 1 indexed citations
19.
Kumar, Harish, et al.. (1990). Chromosome manipulation for protein improvement in pea (Pisum sativum L.).. Journal of genetics & breeding. 44(4). 249–252. 2 indexed citations
20.
Pawar, C S, et al.. (1983). Pheromone trap network for Heliothis armigera in India. Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics). 58. 938–42. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026