C. O. Qualset
- Plant Science top 10%
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 2%
- Genetics
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Hugo PeralesStephen B. BrushWilliam A. WilliamsH. VogtR. C. HuffakerD. W. RainsK.P. RaoC. W. Schaller
- Topics
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (16 papers)Genetics and Plant Breeding (12 papers)Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoMorocco
In The Last Decade
C. O. Qualset
32 papers receiving 386 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Plant Science 330
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110
- Genetics 105
- Agronomy and Crop Science 75
- Molecular Biology 49
Countries citing papers authored by C. O. Qualset
This map shows the geographic impact of C. O. Qualset's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. O. Qualset with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. O. Qualset more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. O. Qualset
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. O. Qualset. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. O. Qualset. The network helps show where C. O. Qualset may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. O. Qualset
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. O. Qualset. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. O. Qualset based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. O. Qualset. C. O. Qualset is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 125 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 90 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Evaluation and utilization of Dasypyrum villosum as a genetic resource for wheat improvement. | 13 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Benefits and limitations in breeding salt-tolerant crops | 8 |
| 8 | Report of the second TAC-Quinquennial review of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) | 4 |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | Utilization of urea, ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate by crop plants in a Controlled Ecological Life Support System (CELSS) | 3 |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | Nutritional evaluation of starches, rice flours and carbohydrates using Tribolium castaneum larvae and chickens | 1 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About C. O. Qualset
C. O. Qualset is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 33 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (16 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (12 papers) and Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (110 citations), Plant Science (330 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (75 citations). C. O. Qualset has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include Hugo Perales, Stephen B. Brush, William A. Williams, H. Vogt, R. C. Huffaker, D. W. Rains, K.P. Rao, C. W. Schaller, J. N. Rutger and Chao‐Chien Jan. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Pharmacology, Crop Science and Euphytica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.