C. N. L. Brooke
- Classics top 0.05%
- History top 0.2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael BrettDorothy WhitelockJ. R. L. HIGHFIELDDavid KnowlesR. A. B. MynorsM. R. JamesCharles R. YoungWalter Map
- Topics
- Medieval Literature and History (26 papers)Historical Studies of British Isles (9 papers)Historical and Archaeological Studies (7 papers)
- Cited by
- ClassicsHistoryReligious studies
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
C. N. L. Brooke
47 papers receiving 314 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Classics 341
- History 267
- Political Science and International Relations 104
- Sociology and Political Science 57
- Philosophy 50
Countries citing papers authored by C. N. L. Brooke
This map shows the geographic impact of C. N. L. Brooke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. N. L. Brooke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. N. L. Brooke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. N. L. Brooke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. N. L. Brooke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. N. L. Brooke. The network helps show where C. N. L. Brooke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. N. L. Brooke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. N. L. Brooke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. N. L. Brooke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. N. L. Brooke. C. N. L. Brooke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | De nugis curialium = Courtiers' trifles | 34 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Popular religion in the Middle Ages: Western Europe, 1000-1300 | 7 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Church and government in the Middle Ages : essays presented to C. R. Cheney on his 70th birthday | 7 |
| 12 | Church and government in the middle ages | 19 |
| 13 | The heads of religious houses, England and Wales | 3 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | Councils & synods with other documents relating to the English church | 53 |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | The letters of John of Salisbury | 45 |
| 20 | 0 |
About C. N. L. Brooke
C. N. L. Brooke is a scholar working on Classics, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 63 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (26 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (9 papers) and Historical and Archaeological Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (341 citations), History (267 citations) and Religious studies (36 citations). C. N. L. Brooke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Michael Brett, Dorothy Whitelock, J. R. L. HIGHFIELD, David Knowles, R. A. B. Mynors, M. R. James, Charles R. Young, Walter Map, R. H. Hilton and Dom David Knowles. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Communications, The Economic Journal and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.