Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research
2007807 citationsC. Mirjam van Praag et al.Small Business Economicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by C. Mirjam van Praag
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Mirjam van Praag's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Mirjam van Praag with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Mirjam van Praag more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Mirjam van Praag
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Mirjam van Praag. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Mirjam van Praag. The network helps show where C. Mirjam van Praag may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Mirjam van Praag
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Mirjam van Praag.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Mirjam van Praag based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. Mirjam van Praag. C. Mirjam van Praag is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hsieh, Chihmao, Simon C. Parker, & C. Mirjam van Praag. (2016). Risk, balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. 48(2). 287–302.49 indexed citations
Sloof, Randolph & C. Mirjam van Praag. (2008). The degradation of distorted performance measures: An application to residual income based measures like EVA. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
Praag, C. Mirjam van, et al.. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics. 29(4). 351–382.807 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Praag, C. Mirjam van. (2006). Successful Entrepreneurship: Confronting Economic Theory With Empirical Practice.33 indexed citations
9.
Praag, C. Mirjam van & Justin van der Sluis. (2004). Economic returns to education for entrepreneurs: The development of a neglected child in the family of economics of education?. 11(2). 183–226.13 indexed citations
10.
Sluis, Justin van der, C. Mirjam van Praag, & A. van Witteloostuijn. (2004). Comparing the returns to education for entrepreneurs and employees. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).14 indexed citations
11.
Praag, C. Mirjam van, Gerrit de Wit, & Niels Bosma. (2004). Initial capital constraints hinder entrepreneurial venture performance: An empirical analysis.9 indexed citations
12.
Sluis, Justin van der, C. Mirjam van Praag, & Wim P. M. Vijverberg. (2003). Entrepreneurship Selection and Performance. Econstor (Econstor).5 indexed citations
Praag, C. Mirjam van & J. S. Cramer. (1999). An estimated equilibrium model of business formation and labor demand of entrepreneurs.6 indexed citations
18.
Praag, C. Mirjam van. (1997). Determinants of succesful entrepreneurship.1 indexed citations
19.
Praag, C. Mirjam van, et al.. (1996). Start-, slaag- en faalkansen van hoger opgeleide en startende ondernemers.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.