C. M. van Herk
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Ecology
- Insect Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- André AptrootH.F. van DobbenHarrie J. M. SipmanVolkmar WirthL.B. SparriusPieter van den BoomPaul DiederichFred J.A. Daniëls
- Topics
- Lichen and fungal ecology (19 papers)Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (18 papers)Bryophyte Studies and Records (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyLuxembourg
In The Last Decade
C. M. van Herk
22 papers receiving 718 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 754
- Plant Science 614
- Ecological Modeling 78
- Ecology 74
- Insect Science 73
Countries citing papers authored by C. M. van Herk
This map shows the geographic impact of C. M. van Herk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. M. van Herk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. M. van Herk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. M. van Herk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. M. van Herk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. M. van Herk. The network helps show where C. M. van Herk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. M. van Herk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. M. van Herk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. M. van Herk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. M. van Herk. C. M. van Herk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 116 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | Nieuwe korstmossen en licheenparasieten in Nederland, met aanvullingen op de checklist | 2 |
| 5 | Nieuwe en interessante korstmossen en korstmosparasieten in Nederland met aanvulling en wijzigingen op de checklist | 5 |
| 6 | 166 | |
| 7 | Lichenen van het najaarsweekend op Terschelling en enkele kerken in noordwest Friesland | 1 |
| 8 | Korstmossen van Gelderland en aangrenzend Flevoland en van soortenrijke kerkmuren in de IJsselvallei | 1 |
| 9 | Checklist van de Nederlandse lichenen en lichenicole fungi | 19 |
| 10 | 135 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 69 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | Bedreigde en kwetsbare korstmossen in Nederland | 4 |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About C. M. van Herk
C. M. van Herk is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Atmospheric Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 809 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lichen and fungal ecology (19 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (18 papers) and Bryophyte Studies and Records (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (754 citations), Ecological Modeling (78 citations) and Plant Science (614 citations). C. M. van Herk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include André Aptroot, H.F. van Dobben, Harrie J. M. Sipman, Volkmar Wirth, L.B. Sparrius, Pieter van den Boom, Paul Diederich and Fred J.A. Daniëls. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Pollution and The Lichenologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.