C. M. Thomas

416 total citations
9 papers, 349 citations indexed

About

C. M. Thomas is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, C. M. Thomas has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 349 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Plant Science, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 1 paper in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in C. M. Thomas's work include Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (3 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (3 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (3 papers). C. M. Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (3 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (3 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (3 papers). C. M. Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. C. M. Thomas's co-authors include Stephen D. Davis, F. Chris H. Franklin, David H. Jones, Jonathan D. G. Jones, Bernard J. Carroll, Paul Simpson, W. G. Cleary, Mari‐Anne Newman, Noel Ellis and Victor Klimyuk and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Genetics and Oecologia.

In The Last Decade

C. M. Thomas

9 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C. M. Thomas United Kingdom	7	225	144	77	70	52	9	349
H. B. Kriebel United States	12	193 0.9×	166 1.2×	72 0.9×	139 2.0×	34 0.7×	24	383
A. Scaltsoyiannes Greece	12	163 0.7×	156 1.1×	30 0.4×	73 1.0×	70 1.3×	29	365
Warren L. Nance United States	10	260 1.2×	208 1.4×	29 0.4×	77 1.1×	167 3.2×	20	464
A. Plourde Canada	11	267 1.2×	214 1.5×	24 0.3×	33 0.5×	28 0.5×	16	356
G. K. Kiss Canada	12	181 0.8×	130 0.9×	26 0.3×	124 1.8×	92 1.8×	15	445
Biyue Tan Sweden	8	246 1.1×	127 0.9×	32 0.4×	130 1.9×	258 5.0×	9	470
Jared M. LeBoldus United States	15	435 1.9×	262 1.8×	33 0.4×	33 0.5×	44 0.8×	48	616
Marie Deslauriers Canada	9	119 0.5×	104 0.7×	43 0.6×	132 1.9×	166 3.2×	12	347
Dongli Gao China	14	396 1.8×	221 1.5×	44 0.6×	45 0.6×	104 2.0×	26	548
Sheree Cato New Zealand	7	150 0.7×	154 1.1×	13 0.2×	45 0.6×	142 2.7×	9	317

Countries citing papers authored by C. M. Thomas

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. M. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. M. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. M. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. M. Thomas

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. M. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. M. Thomas. The network helps show where C. M. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. M. Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. M. Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. M. Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. M. Thomas. C. M. Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Thomas, C. M., Erik A. van der Biezen, Mark S. Dixon, Catherine Golstein, & Jonathan D. G. Jones. (2000). Plant disease resistance genes.. 1205–1212. 5 indexed citations

2.

Haanstra, J. P. W., C. M. Thomas, Jonathan D. G. Jones, & P. Lindhout. (1996). A functional Cf-4 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum Cke. is present in Cf8 and Cf11-lines.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 46. 9–10. 1 indexed citations

3.

Carroll, Bernard J., et al.. (1995). Distribution of unlinked transpositions of a Ds element from a T-DNA locus on tomato chromosome 4.. Genetics. 141(1). 383–390. 8 indexed citations

4.

Carroll, Bernard J., Victor Klimyuk, C. M. Thomas, et al.. (1995). Germinal transpositions of the maize element Dissociation from T-DNA loci in tomato.. Genetics. 139(1). 407–420. 60 indexed citations

5.

Jones, David H., et al.. (1994). Molecular analysis of the operon which encodes the RNA polymerase sigma factor O54 of Escherichia coli. Microbiology. 140(5). 1035–1043. 46 indexed citations

6.

Jones, Jonathan D. G., Gerard J. Bishop, Bernard J. Carroll, et al.. (1992). Prospects for establishing a tomato gene tagging system using the maize transposonActivator (Ac). Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section B Biological Sciences. 99(3-4). 107–119. 8 indexed citations

7.

Thomas, C. M. & Stephen D. Davis. (1989). Recovery patterns of three chaparral shrub species after wildfire. Oecologia. 80(3). 309–320. 107 indexed citations

8.

Ellis, Noel, et al.. (1988). 5S rRNA genes in Pisum: Sequence, long range and chromosomal organization. Molecular and General Genetics MGG. 214(2). 333–342. 80 indexed citations

9.

Thomas, C. M., Roger Hull, John A. Bryant, & Andrew J. Maule. (1985). Isolation of a fraction from cauliflower mosaic virus-infected protoplasts which is active in the synthesis of (+) and (−) strand viral DNA and reverse transcription of primed RNA templates. Nucleic Acids Research. 13(12). 4557–4576. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact