C. Lee Giles

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

C. Lee Giles is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Clinical Psychology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Lee Giles has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in C. Lee Giles's work include Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers) and Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (2 papers). C. Lee Giles is often cited by papers focused on Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers) and Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (2 papers). C. Lee Giles collaborates with scholars based in United States. C. Lee Giles's co-authors include Milton Kerker, Walter J. Wild, Eugene W. Wang, Richard C. Rogers, Pamela M. Diamond, Robert D. Morgan, Haiying Liu, Gene Gindi, Harrison H. Barrett and R. G. Simpson and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Medical Physics and Journal of the Optical Society of America A.

In The Last Decade

C. Lee Giles

10 papers receiving 981 citations

Hit Papers

Electromagnetic scattering by magnetic spheres 1983 2026 1997 2011 1983 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Lee Giles United States 8 531 522 512 206 180 10 1.0k
Jeffery Allen United States 18 339 0.6× 298 0.6× 390 0.8× 441 2.1× 296 1.6× 93 957
Jingzhou Xu United States 19 746 1.4× 431 0.8× 108 0.2× 1.6k 7.8× 54 0.3× 55 1.9k
Wen Cheng United States 8 464 0.9× 279 0.5× 81 0.2× 157 0.8× 33 0.2× 15 596
M. Bauer Germany 22 916 1.7× 329 0.6× 411 0.8× 558 2.7× 21 0.1× 58 1.5k
John S. Derov United States 12 442 0.8× 371 0.7× 314 0.6× 287 1.4× 130 0.7× 40 801
Srini Krishnamurthy United States 15 506 1.0× 380 0.7× 530 1.0× 574 2.8× 318 1.8× 43 1.2k
R. S. Penciu Greece 16 257 0.5× 452 0.9× 600 1.2× 220 1.1× 416 2.3× 20 986
Michael Steinert Germany 17 430 0.8× 440 0.8× 338 0.7× 309 1.5× 97 0.5× 48 902
Emmanuel Centeno France 16 822 1.5× 437 0.8× 476 0.9× 615 3.0× 163 0.9× 67 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by C. Lee Giles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Lee Giles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Lee Giles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Lee Giles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Lee Giles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Lee Giles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Lee Giles. The network helps show where C. Lee Giles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Lee Giles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Lee Giles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Lee Giles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Lee Giles. C. Lee Giles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Song, Michael M., et al.. (2017). Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder with Suicide Obsessions in a First Responder without Previous Diagnosis of OCD or History of Suicide Attempts. Case Reports in Psychiatry. 2017(1). 4808275–4808275. 10 indexed citations
2.
Giles, C. Lee, et al.. (2012). The Detection of Feigning Using Multiple PAI Scale Elevations. Assessment. 20(4). 437–447. 21 indexed citations
3.
Wang, Eugene W., et al.. (1997). A pilot study of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) in corrections: assessment of malingering, suicide risk, and aggression in male inmates. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 15(4). 469–482. 79 indexed citations
4.
Giles, C. Lee, et al.. (1985). Bistable Reflection At The Nonlinear Interface With Linear Magnetic Properties. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 517. 219–219. 1 indexed citations
5.
Giles, C. Lee & Walter J. Wild. (1985). Brewster angles for magnetic media. International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves. 6(3). 187–197. 17 indexed citations
6.
Kerker, Milton, et al.. (1983). Electromagnetic scattering by magnetic spheres. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 73(6). 765–765. 708 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Kerker, Milton, et al.. (1982). Mie scattering from a magnetic sphere immersed. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 72. 1826. 1 indexed citations
8.
Gindi, Gene, et al.. (1982). Imaging with rotating slit apertures and rotating collimators. Medical Physics. 9(3). 324–339. 18 indexed citations
9.
Giles, C. Lee & Walter J. Wild. (1982). Fresnel reflection and transmission at a planar boundary from media of equal refractive indices. Applied Physics Letters. 40(3). 210–212. 29 indexed citations
10.
Wild, Walter J. & C. Lee Giles. (1982). Goos-Hänchen shifts from absorbing media. Physical review. A, General physics. 25(4). 2099–2101. 140 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026