435 total citations 9 papers, 342 citations indexed
About
C. L. Munch is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Speech and Hearing and Computational Mechanics.
According to data from OpenAlex, C. L. Munch has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 342 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 3 papers in Speech and Hearing and 3 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in C. L. Munch's work include Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (7 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (3 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (3 papers). C. L. Munch is often cited by papers focused on Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (7 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (3 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (3 papers). C. L. Munch collaborates with scholars based in Russia and United States. C. L. Munch's co-authors include R. W. Paterson, Martin R. Fink, Paul G. Vogt, R. K. Amiet, Robert King and Robert Patterson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Aircraft, Journal of the American Helicopter Society and Rosa P: A digital library for transportation research (United States Department of Transportation).
Citations per year, relative to C. L. Munch C. L. Munch (= 1×)
peers
Paul G. Vogt
Countries citing papers authored by C. L. Munch
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of C. L. Munch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. L. Munch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. L. Munch more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. L. Munch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. L. Munch. The network helps show where C. L. Munch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. L. Munch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. L. Munch.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. L. Munch based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. L. Munch. C. L. Munch is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Munch, C. L., et al.. (1975). Rotor Broadband Noise Resulting from Tip Vortex/Blade Interaction.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).1 indexed citations
Munch, C. L., et al.. (1975). Conceptual design study of 1985 commercial VTOL transports that utilize rotors. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).2 indexed citations
Munch, C. L. & Robert King. (1974). Community acceptance of helicopter noise: Criteria and application. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).6 indexed citations
Paterson, R. W., Paul G. Vogt, Martin R. Fink, & C. L. Munch. (1973). Vortex Noise of Isolated Airfoils. Journal of Aircraft. 10(5). 296–302.287 indexed citations
8.
Munch, C. L.. (1973). Prediction of V/STOL Noise for Application to Community Noise Exposure. Rosa P: A digital library for transportation research (United States Department of Transportation).1 indexed citations
9.
Munch, C. L., et al.. (1970). An application of theory to axial compressor noise. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.