C. L. Jiang

3.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
57 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

C. L. Jiang is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, C. L. Jiang has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 26 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 22 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in C. L. Jiang's work include Nuclear physics research studies (45 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (24 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (23 papers). C. L. Jiang is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (45 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (24 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (23 papers). C. L. Jiang collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and Italy. C. L. Jiang's co-authors include H. Esbensen, K. E. Rehm, K. E. Rehm, R. V. F. Janssens, Xiaodong Tang, R. C. Pardo, B. B. Back, A. M. Stefanini, B. B. Back and C. N. Davids and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Reviews of Modern Physics and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

C. L. Jiang

53 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

Recent developments in heavy-ion fusion reactions 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. L. Jiang United States 23 1.6k 879 447 250 106 57 1.8k
E. F. Aguilera Mexico 23 1.8k 1.1× 982 1.1× 530 1.2× 171 0.7× 84 0.8× 92 1.9k
C. L. Jiang United States 19 1.2k 0.7× 813 0.9× 307 0.7× 140 0.6× 90 0.8× 45 1.3k
F. Hanappe Belgium 26 1.8k 1.1× 780 0.9× 593 1.3× 336 1.3× 60 0.6× 91 1.9k
G. M. Ter–Akopian Russia 22 1.9k 1.2× 696 0.8× 784 1.8× 302 1.2× 61 0.6× 149 2.0k
E. Somorjai Hungary 29 2.0k 1.3× 762 0.9× 944 2.1× 309 1.2× 152 1.4× 127 2.4k
L. R. Gasques Brazil 31 2.6k 1.6× 1.2k 1.4× 723 1.6× 359 1.4× 258 2.4× 101 2.8k
V. Nanal India 18 1.2k 0.7× 607 0.7× 414 0.9× 209 0.8× 42 0.4× 118 1.3k
H. Koura Japan 15 1.4k 0.9× 603 0.7× 350 0.8× 246 1.0× 68 0.6× 50 1.5k
C. N. Davids United States 21 2.0k 1.2× 933 1.1× 615 1.4× 235 0.9× 69 0.7× 110 2.1k
Yu. É. Penionzhkevich Russia 25 2.2k 1.3× 769 0.9× 979 2.2× 446 1.8× 51 0.5× 251 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by C. L. Jiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. L. Jiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. L. Jiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. L. Jiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. L. Jiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. L. Jiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. L. Jiang. The network helps show where C. L. Jiang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. L. Jiang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. L. Jiang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. L. Jiang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. L. Jiang. C. L. Jiang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Montagnoli, G., A. M. Stefanini, C. L. Jiang, et al.. (2022). Fusion of 12 C + 24 Mg at extreme sub-barrier energies. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 49(9). 95101–95101. 3 indexed citations
2.
Talwar, R., P. Mohr, K. Auranen, et al.. (2018). Experimental study of Ar38+α reaction cross sections relevant to the Ca41 abundance in the solar system. Physical review. C. 97(5). 9 indexed citations
3.
Almaraz-Calderon, S., K. E. Rehm, M. Albers, et al.. (2015). Multi-Sampling Ionization Chamber (MUSIC) for measurements of fusion reactions with radioactive beams. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 799. 197–202. 29 indexed citations
4.
Jiang, C. L., K. E. Rehm, B. B. Back, et al.. (2014). Influence of heavy-ion transfer on fusion reactions. Physical Review C. 89(5). 32 indexed citations
5.
Esbensen, H., et al.. (2014). Recent developments in heavy-ion fusion reactions. Reviews of Modern Physics. 86(1). 317–360. 388 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Almaraz-Calderon, S., P. F. Bertone, M. Alcorta, et al.. (2014). Direct Measurement of theNa23(α,p)Mg26Reaction Cross Section at Energies Relevant for the Production of GalacticAl26. Physical Review Letters. 112(15). 152701–152701. 15 indexed citations
7.
Stefanini, A. M., G. Montagnoli, F. Scarlassara, et al.. (2013). Fusion of 60Ni + 100Mo near and below the Coulomb barrier. The European Physical Journal A. 49(5). 41 indexed citations
8.
Kinoshita, Norikazu, Matthew J. Paul, Y. Kashiv, et al.. (2011). Shorter 146Sm half-life and revised 146Sm-142Nd ages of planetary mantle differentiation. arXiv (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations
9.
Alcorta, M., K. E. Rehm, B. B. Back, et al.. (2011). Fusion Reactions with the One-Neutron Halo NucleusC15. Physical Review Letters. 106(17). 172701–172701. 22 indexed citations
10.
Figueira, J. M., C. M. Deibel, J. O. Fernández Niello, et al.. (2010). Study of the 30P(α,p)[sup 33]S reaction using a gas-filled magnetic spectrograph. AIP conference proceedings. 174–175. 1 indexed citations
11.
Jiang, C. L., A. M. Stefanini, H. Esbensen, et al.. (2010). Fusion hindrance for Ca+Ca systems: Influence of neutron excess. Physical Review C. 82(4). 49 indexed citations
12.
Esbensen, H., C. L. Jiang, & A. M. Stefanini. (2010). Hindrance in the fusion ofCa48+Ca48. Physical Review C. 82(5). 41 indexed citations
13.
Greife, U., K. E. Rehm, C. M. Deibel, et al.. (2009). Experiments to Further the Understanding of the Triple-Alpha Process in Hot Astrophysical Scenarios. AIP conference proceedings. 181–186. 1 indexed citations
14.
Jiang, C. L., et al.. (2009). Heavy-ion fusion hindrance and its implication on astrophysics. AIP conference proceedings. 145–152. 1 indexed citations
15.
Schiffer, J. P., S. J. Freeman, Jason A. Clark, et al.. (2008). Nuclear Structure Relevant to Neutrinoless DoubleβDecay:Ge76andSe76. Physical Review Letters. 100(11). 112501–112501. 85 indexed citations
16.
Jiang, C. L.. (2006). Heavy-Ion Fusion Hindrance at Extreme Sub-barrier Energies. AIP conference proceedings. 853. 63–68. 1 indexed citations
17.
Jiang, C. L., K. E. Rehm, R. V. F. Janssens, et al.. (2004). Influence of Nuclear Structure on Sub-Barrier Hindrance inNi+NiFusion. Physical Review Letters. 93(1). 235 indexed citations
18.
Back, B. B., D. J. Blumenthal, C. N. Davids, et al.. (1999). Fission hindrance in hot216Th: Evaporation residue measurements. Physical Review C. 60(4). 96 indexed citations
19.
Rehm, K. E., C. L. Jiang, M. Paul, et al.. (1997). Exploring the18F(p,γ)19Negateway to the formation of heavy elements in hot stars. Physical Review C. 55(2). R566–R569. 14 indexed citations
20.
Back, B. B., D. J. Blumenthal, C. N. Davids, et al.. (1996). Transport efficiency of the Argonne fragment mass analyzer. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 379(2). 206–211. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026