C. K. Prout

1.9k citations
105 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

C. K. Prout

99 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

C. K. Prout
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Inorganic Chemistry 561
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 279
  • Organic Chemistry 662
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 390
  • Oncology 394
Replace A. D. Rae with:
A. D. Rae Australia
S. C. Wallwork United Kingdom
R. Mason United Kingdom
Klaas Eriks United States
John L. Burmeister United States
G. A. Razuvaev Russia
D.A. Clemente Italy
Milton D. Glick United States
Luigi Sacconi Italy
J. Lewis United Kingdom
C. K. Prout relative to A. D. Rae Australia A. D. Rae's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
A. D. Rae · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. K. Prout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. K. Prout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. K. Prout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. K. Prout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. K. Prout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. K. Prout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. K. Prout. The network helps show where C. K. Prout may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. K. Prout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. K. Prout Line = papers co-authored together C. K. Prout links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Crystal-Structure of Monochloro Trinitro Cu(Ii) Lignocaine Complex
19931
2 19915
3 198010
4 197122
5 19711
6 197122
7 197120
8 197112
9 197128
10 197111
11 19694
12 19690
13 19687
14 196836
15 196745
16 19662
17 19651
18 19655
19 196511
20 196124

About C. K. Prout

C. K. Prout is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Process Chemistry and Technology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 105 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal complexes synthesis and properties (27 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (26 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (15 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (14 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (13 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (10 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (10 papers) and Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (561 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (279 citations), Organic Chemistry (662 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (390 citations) and Oncology (394 citations). C. K. Prout has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include F. J. C. Rossotti, John D. Wright, J. R. Carruthers, Ian J. Tickle, T. Stanley Cameron, Peter Murray‐Rust, B. Kamenar, H. M. Powell, D.J. Watkin and Louis T. J. Delbaere. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials, Tetrahedron Letters, Tetrahedron and Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026