C. Joram

8.6k total citations
10 papers, 120 citations indexed

About

C. Joram is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Joram has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 120 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in C. Joram's work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (9 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (7 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers). C. Joram is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (9 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (7 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers). C. Joram collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Canada. C. Joram's co-authors include W. Kluge, M. Metzler, B. M. Barnett, D. Renker, Gerhard Wagner, R. Bilger, H. Matthäy, H. Clement, G. Wagner and H. Clement and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Letters B, Nuclear Physics A and Europhysics Letters (EPL).

In The Last Decade

C. Joram

10 papers receiving 117 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C. Joram Germany	7	116	20	17	7	5	10	120
C. Defoix France	8	154 1.3×	22 1.1×	10 0.6×	5 0.7×	2 0.4×	11	167
C. D. Buchanan United States	7	117 1.0×	22 1.1×	10 0.6×	20 2.9×	2 0.4×	8	132
E. C. Swallow United States	7	141 1.2×	17 0.8×	7 0.4×	5 0.7×	6 1.2×	13	147
R. S. Longacre United States	9	278 2.4×	28 1.4×	17 1.0×	4 0.6×	4 0.8×	14	285
M. Švec Canada	9	221 1.9×	13 0.7×	15 0.9×	3 0.4×	2 0.4×	28	234
K. Kleinknecht Germany	2	87 0.8×	13 0.7×	6 0.4×	6 0.9×	10 2.0×	3	96
D. Bridges United States	5	127 1.1×	21 1.1×	11 0.6×	4 0.6×	8 1.6×	10	136
V. Sreedhar United States	8	179 1.5×	20 1.0×	9 0.5×	9 1.3×	9 1.8×	18	191
K. Braune Germany	6	151 1.3×	36 1.8×	17 1.0×	5 0.7×	9 1.8×	7	159
L.V. Filʼkov Russia	8	182 1.6×	17 0.8×	6 0.4×	3 0.4×	9 1.8×	21	195

Countries citing papers authored by C. Joram

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Joram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Joram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Joram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Joram

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Joram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Joram. The network helps show where C. Joram may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Joram

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Joram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Joram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Joram. C. Joram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Föhl, K., B. M. Barnett, R. Bilger, et al.. (1996). Low-energy pionic double charge exchange on theββ-instable nucleiTe128,130. Physical Review C. 53(5). R2033–R2037. 4 indexed citations

2.

Denig, A. G., C. Joram, W. Kluge, et al.. (1996). Measurement of theπ+p→analyzing power at 68.3 MeV. Physical Review C. 54(4). 1930–1934. 9 indexed citations

3.

Joram, C., M. Metzler, W. Kluge, et al.. (1995). Low-energy differential cross sections of pion-proton (π±p) scattering. I. The isospin-even forward scattering amplitude atTπ=32.2 and 44.6 MeV. Physical Review C. 51(4). 2144–2158. 19 indexed citations

4.

Joram, C., M. Metzler, W. Kluge, et al.. (1995). Low-energy differential cross sections of pion-proton (π±p) scattering. II. Phase shifts atTπ=32.7, 45.1, and 68.6 MeV. Physical Review C. 51(4). 2159–2165. 10 indexed citations

5.

Clement, H., R. Bilger, K. Föhl, et al.. (1993). Resonance-like behaviour of the pionic double charge exchange at low energies. Nuclear Physics A. 553. 589–593. 3 indexed citations

6.

Bilger, R., H. Clement, C. Joram, et al.. (1992). Evidence for a dibaryon resonance in the pionic double charge exchange. The European Physical Journal A. 343(4). 491–492. 24 indexed citations

7.

Bilger, R., B. M. Barnett, H. Clement, et al.. (1991). Measurement of pion induced double charge exchange on 34S and 56Fe at Tπ = 50 MeV. Physics Letters B. 269(3-4). 247–251. 21 indexed citations

8.

Barnett, B. M., H. Clement, Richard R. Johnson, et al.. (1991). Precision Measurements of Low-Energy Pion Scattering on Sulphur Isotopes. Europhysics Letters (EPL). 15(1). 11–16. 6 indexed citations

9.

Barnett, B. M., H. Clement, W. Gyles, et al.. (1990). Isospin mixing of the 1+ doublet in 12C determined by low-energy pion scattering. Physics Letters B. 238(1). 36–40. 12 indexed citations

10.

Barnett, B. M., H. Clement, G. Wagner, et al.. (1990). Normalisation of scattering cross sections for low-energy pions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 297(3). 444–451. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact