C. J. Ancker

815 citations
29 papers · 618 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

C. J. Ancker

27 papers receiving 519 citations

Peers

C. J. Ancker
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Management Information Systems 238
  • Management Science and Operations Research 192
  • Emergency Medical Services 48
  • Transportation 38
  • Control and Systems Engineering 99
Replace J. Medhi with:
J. Medhi India
Shuangchi He United States
Rym M’Hallah Kuwait
B.D. Bunday United Kingdom
Pappu Kumar India
Izack Cohen Israel
Robert G. Batson United States
Yixin Zhu China
D. J. Medeiros United States
V. V. S. Sarma India
C. J. Ancker relative to J. Medhi India J. Medhi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
J. Medhi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. J. Ancker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. J. Ancker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. J. Ancker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. J. Ancker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. J. Ancker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. J. Ancker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. J. Ancker. The network helps show where C. J. Ancker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside C. J. Ancker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. J. Ancker Line = papers co-authored together C. J. Ancker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1963184
2 1978100
3 195865
4 195831
5 195828
6 196626
7 196325
8 199523
9 196115
10 198412
11 197611
12 196711
13 196511
14 196310
15
Doctrine for Asymmetric Warfare
20039
16 19648
17 19878
18
Field Manual 5.0: Exercising Command and Control in an Era of Persistent Conflict
20106
19 19686
20 19676

About C. J. Ancker

C. J. Ancker is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 29 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Military Defense Systems Analysis (9 papers), Guidance and Control Systems (8 papers), Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (7 papers), Simulation Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Military Strategy and Technology (4 papers), Military History and Strategy (3 papers), Traffic control and management (3 papers) and Optimization and Search Problems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (238 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (192 citations), Emergency Medical Services (48 citations), Transportation (38 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (99 citations). C. J. Ancker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A. V. Gafarian, J. N. Goodier, Trevor Williams, Michael Burke, Michael Flynn and C. W. Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as Operations Research, Journal of Applied Mechanics, Naval Research Logistics (NRL), Transportation Science and Winter Simulation Conference.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact