C. I. Li

635 total citations
7 papers, 439 citations indexed

About

C. I. Li is a scholar working on Oncology, Genetics and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, C. I. Li has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 439 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Oncology, 3 papers in Genetics and 3 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in C. I. Li's work include Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers). C. I. Li is often cited by papers focused on Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers). C. I. Li collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Norway. C. I. Li's co-authors include Rowan T. Chlebowski, Dorothy S. Lane, Ross L. Prentice, Jean Wactawski‐Wende, Amanda I. Phipps, Lucile L. Adams‐Campbell, Marcia L. Stefanick, Geoffrey C. Kabat, T.L. Vaughan and Eng‐Yen Huang and has published in prestigious journals such as JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, American Journal of Epidemiology and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

In The Last Decade

C. I. Li

7 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C. I. Li United States	6	305	176	113	74	61	7	439
Oscar Mang China	7	233 0.8×	80 0.5×	78 0.7×	45 0.6×	53 0.9×	8	515
Hyma Schubert Switzerland	9	223 0.7×	146 0.8×	159 1.4×	48 0.6×	80 1.3×	15	445
Lorraine Durcan United Kingdom	9	310 1.0×	281 1.6×	121 1.1×	94 1.3×	58 1.0×	10	454
İbrahim Petekkaya Türkiye	10	261 0.9×	121 0.7×	49 0.4×	111 1.5×	32 0.5×	24	382
Christina A. Dilaveri United States	8	179 0.6×	205 1.2×	29 0.3×	65 0.9×	116 1.9×	17	409
Sabine Pöstlberger Austria	7	288 0.9×	385 2.2×	106 0.9×	73 1.0×	207 3.4×	10	502
Florentine Hilbers Belgium	13	241 0.8×	187 1.1×	91 0.8×	101 1.4×	48 0.8×	32	411
Chan Seok Yoon South Korea	9	170 0.6×	200 1.1×	47 0.4×	48 0.6×	102 1.7×	19	377
Sue Gerty United Kingdom	7	216 0.7×	223 1.3×	148 1.3×	87 1.2×	66 1.1×	9	396
Piera Gargiulo Italy	10	204 0.7×	101 0.6×	47 0.4×	97 1.3×	57 0.9×	26	393

Countries citing papers authored by C. I. Li

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. I. Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. I. Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. I. Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. I. Li

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. I. Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. I. Li. The network helps show where C. I. Li may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. I. Li

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. I. Li. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. I. Li based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. I. Li. C. I. Li is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Livaudais, Jennifer C., Dawn L. Hershman, A. I. Neugut, et al.. (2012). Racial/ethnic differences in initiation of adjuvant hormonal therapy among women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer Jennifer C. LivaudaisDawn L. HershmanLaurel HabelLawrence Kushi • Scarlett Lin GomezChristopher I. LiAlfred I. NeugutLouis Fehrenbacher • Beti ThompsonGloria D. Coronado. 1 indexed citations

2.

Malone, Kathi, et al.. (2011). Bisphosphonate Use After Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Risk of Contralateral Breast Cancer. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 103(23). 1752–1760. 20 indexed citations

3.

Phipps, Amanda I., Rowan T. Chlebowski, Ross L. Prentice, et al.. (2011). Reproductive History and Oral Contraceptive Use in Relation to Risk of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 103(6). 470–477. 165 indexed citations

4.

Ton, Carl C.T., Nicole Vartanian, X. Chai, et al.. (2010). Gene expression array testing of FFPE archival breast tumor samples: an optimized protocol for WG-DASL® sample preparation. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 125(3). 879–883. 17 indexed citations

5.

Li, C. I., Rowan T. Chlebowski, Karen Johnson, et al.. (2010). Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer by Subtype: The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 102(18). 1422–1431. 97 indexed citations

6.

Li, C. I., Janet R. Daling, John D. Potter, et al.. (2007). Timing of Menarche and First Full-Term Birth in Relation to Breast Cancer Risk. American Journal of Epidemiology. 167(2). 230–239. 87 indexed citations

7.

Sun, Lingmei, C. I. Li, Eng‐Yen Huang, & T.L. Vaughan. (2006). Survival Differences by Race in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. American Journal of Epidemiology. 165(3). 271–278. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact