Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Amphetamine-induced dopamine release in human ventral striatum correlates with euphoria
2001522 citationsWayne C. Drevets, C. Gautier et al.Biological Psychiatryprofile →
Pet imaging of serotonin 1A receptor binding in depression
1999503 citationsWayne C. Drevets, Ellen Frank et al.Biological Psychiatryprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Gautier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Gautier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Gautier more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Gautier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Gautier. The network helps show where C. Gautier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Gautier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Gautier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Gautier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. Gautier. C. Gautier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Drevets, Wayne C., C. Gautier, Julie C. Price, et al.. (2001). Amphetamine-induced dopamine release in human ventral striatum correlates with euphoria. Biological Psychiatry. 49(2). 81–96.522 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Leclerc, X., et al.. (2001). [Techniques for evaluating the degree of carotid artery stenosis].. PubMed. 28(1). 17–26.
5.
Mounier‐Véhier, Claire, et al.. (2000). [Better understanding of atheromatous ischemic renal vascular disease].. PubMed. 93(11 Suppl). 1449–58.1 indexed citations
6.
Bérégi, Jean-Paul, Claire Mounier‐Véhier, S. Willoteaux, et al.. (2000). [Intravascular Doppler for the evaluation of renal blood flow: validation and demonstration of vessel reactivity].. PubMed. 25(5). 336–342.5 indexed citations
Gautier, C., et al.. (2000). [Carotid restenosis after endarterectomy. Treatment by angioplasty and endoprosthesis].. PubMed. 81(4). 451–2.1 indexed citations
9.
Drevets, Wayne C., Ellen Frank, Julie C. Price, et al.. (1999). Pet imaging of serotonin 1A receptor binding in depression. Biological Psychiatry. 46(10). 1375–1387.503 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Mounier‐Véhier, Claire, et al.. (1999). [Importance of the echo-doppler and helical angioscanner of the renal arteries in the management of renovascular diseases. Results of a retrospective study in 113 patients].. PubMed. 92(8). 1043–5.10 indexed citations
11.
Mounier‐Véhier, Claire, et al.. (1999). [Anatomic results of the endoluminal revascularization of renal arterial stenoses. A retrospective study of 113 patients].. PubMed. 92(8). 1009–13.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.